Title of article :
Custom-made 3D printed subperiosteal titanium implants for the prosthetic restoration of the atrophic posterior mandible of elderly patients: a case series
Author/Authors :
Mangano, Carlo Department of Dental Sciences - University Vita Salute - Raffaele - Milan, Italy , Bianchi, Andrea Department of Periodontology and Implantology - Istituto Stomatologico Italiano - Milan, Italy , Mangano, Francesco Guido Department of Prevention and Communal Dentistry - Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University - Moscow, Russia , Solop, Ivan Department of Prevention and Communal Dentistry - Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University - Moscow, Russia , Admakin, Oleg Department of Prevention and Communal Dentistry - Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University - Moscow, Russia , Dana, Jessica Private Practice - Lugano, Switzerland , Colombo, Marco Private Practice - Varese, Italy
Abstract :
To present the application of custom-made 3D-printed subperiosteal implants for fixed prosthetic
restoration of the atrophic posterior mandible of elderly patients.
Methods: Between January 2017 and June 2018, all partially edentulous patients aged over 65 years, with two or
more missing teeth in the posterior atrophic mandible, and who did not want to undergo bone regenerative
procedures, were included in this study. These patients were rehabilitated with custom-made subperiosteal
implants, designed from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and fabricated in titanium by means of direct
metal laser sintering (DMLS). The outcome measures were fit and stability of the implants at placement, duration of
the intervention, implant survival, and early and late complications. All patients were followed for 1 year after
surgery.
Results: Ten patients (four males, six females; mean age 69.6, SD ± 2.8, median 69, 95% CI 67.9–71.6) were included
in the study. The fit of the implants was satisfactory, with a mean rating of 7 out of 10 (SD ± 1.6, median 7, 95% CI
6–8). Only two implants had insufficient fit, because of the presence of scattering in the CBCT; however, they were
adapted to the sites during the interventions. The mean duration of the intervention was 44.3 min (SD ± 19.4,
median 37, 95% CI 32.3–56.3). At the one-year follow-up, no implants were lost (survival rate 100%). One implant
presented immediate postoperative complications with pain, discomfort and swelling, and two patients
experienced late complications, having their provisional restorations fractured during the temporisation phase. All
these complications were minor in nature, but the final complication rate amounted to 30% (three of ten patients).
Conclusions: Although this study has limits (small patient sample and short follow-up), DMLS has proven to be an
effective method for fabricating accurate subperiosteal implants, with high survival rates. This may represent an
alternative treatment procedure in elderly patients with a severely atrophic posterior mandible, since it allows
avoidance of regenerative bone therapies. Further studies are needed to confirm these outcomes.
Keywords :
Elderly patients , Custom-made , Subperiosteal implants , Direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) , Atrophic posterior mandible
Journal title :
3D Printing in Medicine