Title of article :
Utilizing a low-cost desktop 3D printer to develop a “one-stop 3D printing lab” for oral and maxillofacial surgery and dentistry fields
Author/Authors :
Kamio, Takashi Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery - Tokyo Dental College - Mihama-ku - Chiba , Japan , Hayashi, Kamichika Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery - Tokyo Dental College - Mihama-ku - Chiba , Japan , Takaki, Takashi Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery - Tokyo Dental College - Mihama-ku - Chiba , Japan , Onda, Takeshi Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery - Tokyo Dental College - Mihama-ku - Chiba , Japan , Shibahara, Takahiko Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery - Tokyo Dental College - Mihama-ku - Chiba , Japan , Yakushiji, Takashi Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery - National Hospital Organization Takasaki General Medical Center - Takamatsu - Takasaki - Gunma , Japan , Shibui, Takeo Department of Oral Medicine - Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery - Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital - Sugano - Ichikawa - Chiba , Japan , Kato, Hiroshi Department of Endodontics - Tokyo Dental College - Masago - Mihama-ku - Chiba , Japan.
Abstract :
In the oral and maxillofacial surgery and dentistry fields, the use of three-dimensional (3D) patient-
specific organ models is increasing, which has increased the cost of obtaining them. We developed an environment in
our facility in which we can design, fabricate, and use 3D models called the “One-stop 3D printing lab”. The lab made it
possible to quickly and inexpensively produce the 3D models that are indispensable for oral and maxillofacial surgery.
We report our 3D model fabrication environment after determining the dimensional accuracy of the models with
different laminating pitches (; layer thickness) after fabricating over 300 3D models. Considerations were made for
further reducing modeling cost and model print time. MDCT imaging was performed using a dry human mandible,
and 3D CAD data were generated from the DICOM image data. 3D models were fabricated with a fused deposition
modeling (FDM) 3D printer MF-2000 (MUTOH) with a laminating pitch of 0.2 mm, 0.3 mm, 0.4 mm, or 0.5 mm. Each 3D
model was then subjected to reverse scanning to evaluate the modeling conditions and deformation during
modeling. For the 3D image processing system, Volume Extractor 3.0 (i-Plants Systems) and POLYGONALmeister V2
(UEL) were used. For the comparative evaluation of CAD data, spGauge 2014.1 (Armonicos) was used.
Results: As the laminating pitch increased, the weight of the 3D model, model print time, and material cost decreased,
and no significant reduction in geometric accuracy was observed.
Conclusions: The amount of modeling material used and preparation cost were reduced by increasing the laminating
pitch. The “One-stop 3D printing lab”made it possible to produce 3D models daily. The use of 3D models in the oral
and maxillofacial surgery and dentistry fields will likely increase, and we expect that low-cost FDM 3D printers that can
produce low-cost 3D models will play a significant role.
Keywords :
Training , 3D printing , FDM 3D printer , Oral and maxillofacial surgery , Accuracy Education , Patient-specific
Journal title :
3D Printing in Medicine