Author/Authors :
Luiz de Toledo Oliveira, Caio Universidade de São Paulo - Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto - Hospital das Clínicas, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil , Abrahão Elias, Felipe Universidade de São Paulo - Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto - Hospital das Clínicas, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil , dos Santos Ribacionka, André Universidade de São Paulo - Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto - Hospital das Clínicas, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil , Hermínio Ferraz Picado, Celso Universidade de São Paulo - Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto - Department of Biomechanics - Medicine and Rehabilitation of the Locomotive Apparatus, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil , Luís Garcia, Flávio Universidade de São Paulo - Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto - Department of Biomechanics - Medicine and Rehabilitation of the Locomotive Apparatus, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
Abstract :
Objective: To determine whether the topical use of gentamicin reduces periprosthetic joint infection rates in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods: We retrospectively evaluated two cohorts of patients who underwent primary THA in a university hospital, with a minimum of 1-year postoperative follow-up and full clinical, laboratory, and radiological documentation. Patients who underwent operation in the first 59 months of the study pe-riod (263 hips) received only intravenous cefazolin as antibiotic prophylaxis (Cef group), and those who underwent operation in the following 43 months (170 hips) received intravenous cefazolin plus topical gentamicin directly applied on the wound as antibiotic prophylaxis (Cef + Gen group). For the diagnosis of periprosthet-ic joint infection, we used the criteria of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Data were analyzed using the Fisher exact test, and p values of <0.05 were considered significant. Results: Thirteen hips (4.9%) in the Cef group and eight hips (4.7%) in the Cef + Gen group presented periprosthetic joint infection. Statis-tical analysis revealed no difference between the infection rates (p = 1.0). Conclusion: Topical gentamicin as used in this study did not reduce periprosthetic joint infection rates in primary THA. Level of Evidence III, Retrospective comparative study
Keywords :
Infection , Arthroplasty , Replacement , Hip , Clinical study , Antibiotic prophylaxis