Author/Authors :
ScheeRlInck, Thierry Department or Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology - Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels , PolflIeT, Mathias Department of Electronics and Informatics (ETRO) - Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels , DekleRck, Rudi Department of Electronics and Informatics (ETRO) - Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels , GoMPel, Gert VAn Medische Beeldvorming en Fysische Wetenschappen (BEFY) - Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels , BulS, nico Medische Beeldvorming en Fysische Wetenschappen (BEFY) - Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels , VAnDeMeuleBRoucke, Jef Department of Electronics and Informatics (ETRO) - Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels
Abstract :
Background and purpose — We developed a marker-free auto-
mated CT-based spatial analysis (CTSA) method to detect stem-
bone migration in consecutive CT datasets and assessed the accu-
racy and precision in vitro. Our aim was to demonstrate that in
vitro accuracy and precision of CTSA is comparable to that of
radiostereometric analysis (RSA).
Material and methods — Stem and bone were segmented in
2 CT datasets and both were registered pairwise. The resulting
rigid transformations were compared and transferred to an ana-
tomically sound coordinate system, taking the stem as reference.
This resulted in 3 translation parameters and 3 rotation param-
eters describing the relative amount of stem-bone displacement,
and it allowed calculation of the point of maximal stem migration.
Accuracy was evaluated in 39 comparisons by imposing known
stem migration on a stem-bone model. Precision was estimated
in 20 comparisons based on a zero-migration model, and in 5
patients without stem loosening.
Results — Limits of the 95% tolerance intervals (TIs) for accu-
racy did not exceed 0.28 mm for translations and 0.20° for rota-
tions (largest standard deviation of the signed error (SDSE): 0.081
mm and 0.057°). In vitro, limits of the 95% TI for precision in a
clinically relevant setting (8 comparisons) were below 0.09 mm
and 0.14° (largest SDSE: 0.012 mm and 0.020°). In patients, the
precision was lower, but acceptable, and dependent on CT scan
resolution.
Interpretation — CTSA allows detection of stem-bone migra-
tion with an accuracy and precision comparable to that of RSA. It
could be valuable for evaluation of subtle stem loosening in clini-
cal practice.
Keywords :
assessment of femoral hip implant migration , Development and validation , automated and marker-free CT-based spatial analysis method