Author/Authors :
Kaymaz, Cihangir Department of Cardiology - Kartal Koşuyolu Heart Education and Research Hospital - İstanbul - Turkey , Mutlu, Bülent Department of Cardiology - Faculty of Medicine - Marmara University - İstanbul - Turkey , Küçükoğlu, M. Serdar Department of Cardiology - Cardiology Institute - İstanbul University - İstanbul - Turkey , Kaya, Barış Department of Cardiology - Faculty of Medicine - Hacettepe University - Ankara - Turkey , Akdeniz, Bahri Department of Cardiology - Faculty of Medicine - Dokuz Eylül University - İzmir - Turkey , Kılıçkıran Avcı, Burçak Department of Cardiology - Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty - İstanbul University - İstanbul - Turkey , Aksakal, Enbiya Department of Cardiology - Faculty of Medicine - Erzurum Atatürk University - Erzurum - Turkey , Akbulut, Mehmet Department of Cardiology - Faculty of Medicine - Fırat University - Elazığ Turkey , Atılgan Arıtürk, Zehra Department of Cardiology - Faculty of Medicine - Dicle University - Diyarbakır - Turkey , Güllülü, Sümeyye Department of Cardiology - Faculty of Medicine - Uludağ University - Bursa - Turkey , Aydoğdu Taçoy, Gülten Department of Cardiology - Faculty of Medicine - Gazi University - Ankara - Turkey , Kayıkçıoğlu, Meral Department of Cardiology - Faculty of Medicine - Ege University İzmir - Turkey , Nalbantgil, Sanem Department of Cardiology - Faculty of Medicine - Ege University İzmir - Turkey , Örem, Cihan Department of Cardiology - Faculty of Medicine - Karadeniz Technical University (KTU) - Trabzon - Turkey , Betül Erer, Hatice Department of Cardiology - Dr. Siyami Ersek Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Center - İstanbul - Turkey , Yüce, Murat Department of Cardiology - Faculty of Medicine - Gaziantep University - Gaziantep - Turkey , Ermiş, Necip Department of Cardiology - Faculty of Medicine - İnönü University - Malatya - Turkey , Tüfekçioğlu, Omaç Department of Cardiology - Ankara Yüksek İhtisas Hospital - Ankara - Turkey , Demir, Mesut Department of Cardiology - Faculty of Medicine - Çukurova University - Adana - Turkey , Birhan Yılmaz19, Mehmet Department of Cardiology - Faculty of Medicine - Cumhuriyet University - Sivas - Turkey , Güngör Kaya, Mehmet Department of Cardiology - Faculty of Medicine - Erciyes University - Kayseri - Turkey , Kültürsay, Hakan Department of Cardiology - Faculty of Medicine - Ege University İzmir - Turkey , Öngen, Zeki Department of Cardiology - Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty - İstanbul University - İstanbul - Turkey , Lale Tokgözoğlu Department of Cardiology - Cerrahpaşa Medical Faculty - İstanbul University - İstanbul - Turkey
Abstract :
Objective: The present study was designed to evaluate the characteristics of pulmonary hypertension (PH) and adult cardiology practice patterns for PH in our country.
Methods: We evaluated preliminary survey data of 1501 patients with PH (females, 69%; age, 44.8±5.45) from 20 adult cardiology centers (AdCCs).
Results: The average experience of AdCCs in diagnosing and treating patients with PH was 8.5±3.7 years. Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) was the most frequent group (69%) followed by group 4 PH (19%), group 3 PH (8%), and combined pre- and post-capillary PH (4%). PAH associated with congenital heart disease (APAH-CHD) was the most frequent subgroup (47%) of PAH. Most of the patients’ functional class (FC) at the time of diagnosis was III. The right heart catheterization (RHC) rate was 11.9±11.6 per month. Most frequently used vasoreactivity agent was intravenous adenosine (60%). All patients under targeted treatments were periodically for FC, six-minute walking test, and echo measures at 3-month intervals. AdCCs repeated RHC in case of clinical worsening (CW). The annual rate of hospitalization was 14.9±19.5. In-hospital use of intravenous iloprost reported from 16 AdCCs in CWs. Bosentan and ambrisentan, as monotreatment or combination treatment (CT), were noted in 845 and 28 patients, respectively, and inhaled iloprost, subcutaneous treprostinil, and intravenous epoprostenol were noted in 283, 30, and four patients, respectively. Bosentan was the first agent used for CT in all AdCCs and iloprost was the second. Routine use of antiaggregant, anticoagulant, and pneumococcal and influenza prophylaxis were restricted in only two AdCCs.
Conclusion: Our nationwide data illustrate the current status of PH regarding clinical characteristics and practice patterns.
Keywords: