Title of article :
Which is the best treatment for prosthetic joint infections due to Propioni- bacterium acnes: need for further biofi lm in vitro and experimental foreign- body in vivo studies?
Author/Authors :
Bayston, Roger BRIG - Academic Orthopaedics - University Hospitals Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK , Ashraf, Waheed BRIG - Academic Orthopaedics - University Hospitals Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
Abstract :
We read with a great interest the recent paper by Jacobs
et al. (2015) concerning the treatment of prosthetic joint
infections (PJI) caused by Propionibacterium acnes and the
associated comments (Bayston and Ashraf 2016). The fi rst
paper suggests that combination therapy with rifampicin is
not more effective than therapy without rifampicin. We dem-
onstrated previously in vitro and in an animal foreign body
infection model that the minimal eradication biofi lm concen-
tration (MBEC) was the lowest with rifampicin (16 mg/L)
alone compared with penicillin G, daptomycin, ceftriaxone,
levofl oxacin, vancomycin, and clindamycin (Furustrand
et al. 2012). However, we have reported the emergence of
rifampicin-resistant P. acnes strains in vitro (Furustrand et al.
Keywords :
Propionibacterium acnes , best treatment , prosthetic joint , infections
Journal title :
Acta Orthopaedica