Title of article
Which is the best treatment for prosthetic joint infections due to Propioni- bacterium acnes: need for further biofi lm in vitro and experimental foreign- body in vivo studies?
Author/Authors
Bayston, Roger BRIG - Academic Orthopaedics - University Hospitals Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK , Ashraf, Waheed BRIG - Academic Orthopaedics - University Hospitals Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
Pages
2
From page
318
To page
319
Abstract
We read with a great interest the recent paper by Jacobs
et al. (2015) concerning the treatment of prosthetic joint
infections (PJI) caused by Propionibacterium acnes and the
associated comments (Bayston and Ashraf 2016). The fi rst
paper suggests that combination therapy with rifampicin is
not more effective than therapy without rifampicin. We dem-
onstrated previously in vitro and in an animal foreign body
infection model that the minimal eradication biofi lm concen-
tration (MBEC) was the lowest with rifampicin (16 mg/L)
alone compared with penicillin G, daptomycin, ceftriaxone,
levofl oxacin, vancomycin, and clindamycin (Furustrand
et al. 2012). However, we have reported the emergence of
rifampicin-resistant P. acnes strains in vitro (Furustrand et al.
Keywords
Propionibacterium acnes , best treatment , prosthetic joint , infections
Journal title
Acta Orthopaedica
Serial Year
2016
Record number
2618150
Link To Document