Title of article :
Preparation of the femoral bone cavity in cementless stems: broaching versus compaction
Author/Authors :
HJORTH, Mette H Department of Orthopaedics - Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus , STILLING, Maiken Department of Orthopaedics - Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus , SØBALLE, Kjeld Department of Orthopaedics - Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus , NIELSEN, Poul Torben Department of Orthopaedics - Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark , CHRISTENSEN, Poul H Department of Orthopaedics - Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark , KOLD,Søren Department of Orthopaedics - Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus
Abstract :
Background and purpose — Short-term experimental stud-
ies have confi rmed that there is superior fi xation of cementless
implants inserted with compaction compared to broaching of the
cancellous bone.
Patients and methods — 1-stage, bilateral primary THA was
performed in 28 patients between May 2001 and September 2007.
The patients were randomized to femoral bone preparation with
broaching on 1 side and compaction on the other side. 8 patients
declined to attend the postoperative follow-up, leaving 20 patients
(13 male) with a mean age of 58 (36–70) years for evaluation. The
patients were followed with radiostereometric analysis (RSA) at
baseline, at 6 and 12 weeks, and at 1, 2, and 5 years, and measure-
ments of periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) at baseline
and at 1, 2, and 5 years. The subjective part of the Harris hip
score (HHS) and details of complications throughout the observa-
tion period were obtained at a mean interval of 6.3 (3.0–9.5) years
after surgery.
Results — Femoral stems in the compaction group had a higher
degree of medio-lateral migration (0.21 mm, 95% CI: 0.03–0.40)
than femoral stems in the broaching group at 5 years (p = 0.02).
No other signifi cant differences in translations or rotations were
found between the 2 surgical techniques at 2 years (p > 0.4) and
5 years (p > 0.7) postoperatively. There were no individual stems
with continuous migration. Periprosthetic BMD in the 7 Gruen
zones was similar at 2 years and at 5 years. Intraoperative femo-
ral fractures occurred in 2 of 20 compacted hips, but there were
none in the 20 broached hips. The HHS and dislocations were
similar in the 2 groups at 6.3 (3.0–9.5) years after surgery.
Interpretation — Bone compaction as a surgical technique with
the Bi-Metric stem did not show the superior outcomes expected
compared to conventional broaching. Furthermore, 2 peripros-thetic fractures occurred using the compaction technique, so we
cannot recommend compaction for insertion of the cementless Bi-
Metric stem.
Keywords :
cementless stems , broaching versus compaction , femoral bone cavity , Preparation
Journal title :
Acta Orthopaedica