Title of article :
MR Angiography of the Head/Neck Vascular System in Mice on a Clinical MRI System
Author/Authors :
Reimann, Carolin Department of Radiology - Charite—Universitatsmedizin Berlin - Chariteplatz - Berlin, Germany , Brangsch, Julia Department of Radiology - Charite—Universitatsmedizin Berlin - Chariteplatz - Berlin, Germany , Christine Adams, Lisa Department of Radiology - Charite—Universitatsmedizin Berlin - Chariteplatz - Berlin, Germany , Thone-Reineke, Christa Department of Veterinary Medicine - Institute of Animal Welfare - Animal Behavior and Laboratory Animal Science - Freie Universitat Berlin - Konigsweg - Building - Berlin, Germany , Hamm, Bernd Department of Radiology - Charite—Universitatsmedizin Berlin - Chariteplatz - Berlin, Germany , Richard Makowski, Marcus Department of Radiology - Charite—Universitatsmedizin Berlin - Chariteplatz - Berlin, Germany
Pages :
9
From page :
1
To page :
9
Abstract :
Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) represents a clinical reference standard for the in vivo assessment of the vasculature. In this study, the potential of non-contrast-enhanced and contrast-enhanced angiography of the head/neck vasculature in mice on a clinical MR imaging system was tested. Methods. All in vivo magnetic resonance imaging was performed with a 3T clinical system (Siemens). Non-contrast-enhanced (time-of-fight, TOF) and contrast-enhanced angiography (gadofosveset-trisodium, GdT) were performed in C57BL/6J mouse strain. Lumen-to-muscle ratios (LMRs) and area measurements were assessed. Histology was performed as reference standard of all relevant vascular structures. Results. A close correlation between TOF (R2 = 0.79; p < 0.05) and contrast-enhanced (GdT) angiography (R2 = 0.92; p < 0.05) with histological area measurements was found. LMRs were comparable between both sequences. Regarding interobserver reproducibility, contrast-enhanced (GdT) angiography yielded a smaller 95% confidence interval and a closer interreader correlation compared to non-contrast-enhanced (TOF) measurements (−0.73–0.89; R2 = 0.81 vs. −0.55–0.56; R2 = 0.94). Conclusion. This study demonstrates that non-contrast-enhanced and contrast-enhanced angiographies of the head/neck vasculature of small animals can reliably performed on a clinical 3T MR scanner. Contrast-enhanced angiography enables the visualization of vascular structures with higher intravascular contrast and higher reproducibility.
Keywords :
MRI , Head/Neck , Angiography , MRA
Journal title :
Contrast Media and Molecular Imaging
Serial Year :
2019
Full Text URL :
Record number :
2618639
Link To Document :
بازگشت