Title of article :
The additional utility of apparent diffusion coefficient values of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma for predicting metastasis during clinical staging
Author/Authors :
Yoshida, Rika Department of Radiology - Shimane University - Faculty of Medicine, Japan , Yoshizako, Takeshi Department of Radiology - Shimane University - Faculty of Medicine, Japan , Hisatoshi, Araki Department of Radiology - Matsue Seikyo Hospital, Japan , Mori, Hiroshi Department of Radiology - Shimane University - Faculty of Medicine, Japan , Tamaki, Yukihisa Department of Radiation Oncology - Shimane University - Faculty of Medicine, Japan , Ishikawa, Noriyoshi Department of Organ Pathology - Shimane University - Faculty of Medicine, Japan , Kitagaki, Hajime Department of Radiology - Shimane University - Faculty of Medicine, Japan
Pages :
6
From page :
1
To page :
6
Abstract :
Background The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value is known to be an indicator of tumor activity. The ADC value of high-grade clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is significantly lower than that of low-grade clear-cell RCC. Purpose To investigate the utility of ADC values of clear-cell RCC by comparing ADC values between groups with T1a RCC (tumor size ≤ 4 cm) without metastasis and the group with metastasis. Material and Methods A retrospective review was performed on 51 patients with 51 RCCs who underwent 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for evaluating a renal mass confirmed pathologically to be clear-cell RCC between January 2010 and August 2014. We compared ADC values between group A (T1a RCC without metastasis, T1aN0M0) and group B (RCC with metastasis) using the Mann–Whitney U test. Results The patients were divided into group A (n = 30; tumor size: median, 24.5 mm; range, 8–40 mm; ADC value [×10−3 mm2/s]: median, 1.71; range, 1.23–2.24) and group B (n = 21; tumor size: median, 87.5 mm; range, 18–150 mm; ADC value [×10−3 mm2/s]: median, 1.35; range, 0.91–1.94). The ADC value differed significantly between the two groups. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.869. Using the optimum cutoff value (1.552 × 10−3 mm2/s), ADC had a sensitivity of 80.0% and specificity of 81.0%. Conclusion There was a statistically significant difference in the ADC between group A (T1a clear-cell RCC without distant metastasis) and group B (advanced clear-cell RCC with lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis).
Keywords :
Clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) , ADC value , diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) , 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Journal title :
Acta Radiologica Open
Serial Year :
2017
Full Text URL :
Record number :
2619892
Link To Document :
بازگشت