Author/Authors :
Chambers, Jaclyn E. Treatment Research Institute, Philadelphia, USA , Brooks, Adam C. Treatment Research Institute, Philadelphia, USA , Medvin, Rachel Treatment Research Institute, Philadelphia, USA , Metzger, David S. Treatment Research Institute, Philadelphia, USA , Lauby, Jennifer Treatment Research Institute, Philadelphia, USA , Carpenedo, Carolyn M. Treatment Research Institute, Philadelphia, USA , Favor, Kevin E. Treatment Research Institute, Philadelphia, USA , Kirby, Kimberly C. Treatment Research Institute, Philadelphia, USA
Abstract :
Background: Brief interventions such as Screening, a single session of Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment
(SBIRT ) have shown mixed effectiveness in primary care. However, there are indications that multi-session brief inter-
ventions may demonstrate more consistently positive outcomes, and perhaps a more intensive approach would be
of benefit in addressing substance use in primary care. This study compared the effectiveness of SBIRT with a single
BI session (BI/RT ) to a multi-session brief-treatment intervention (BI/RT+) in primary care. We also developed easy-to-
use, evidence-based materials to assist clinicians in delivering these interventions.
Methods/design: This study was conducted in three Federally Qualified Healthcare Centers (FQHCs). A total of
10,935 patients were screened, and 600 individuals were recruited. The sample was primarily Black/African Ameri-
can (82 %) with a mean age of 40. Patients who attended a healthcare appointment were screened for substance
use via the AUDIT and DAST. Patients were eligible for the study if they scored 8 or higher on the AUDIT, were using
only marijuana and scored 2 or higher on the DAST, or were using other illicit drugs and scored 1 or higher on the
DAST. Participants were randomly assigned to receive one-session BI/RT, or two to six sessions of brief intervention
that incorporated elements of motivational enhancement therapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy (BI/RT+). Both
interventions were delivered by behavioral health consultants at the FQHCs. Participants completed follow-up assess-
ments every 3 months for 1 year. Primary outcome variables included substance use treatment sessions attended and
days of substance use. Secondary outcomes included measures of health, employment, legal, and psychiatric func-
tioning and HIV risk behaviors. Additionally, we will conduct an economic evaluation examining cost-effectiveness
and will analyze outcomes from a process evaluation examining patient and provider experiences.
Discussion: The ability of brief interventions to impact substance use has great potential, but research findings
have been mixed. By conducting a large-scale randomized controlled trial in real-world health centers, this study
will answer important questions about the effectiveness of expanded BIs for patients who screen positive for risky
substance use in primary care
Keywords :
Brief intervention , SBIRT , Brief treatment , Substance abuse , Primary care