Author/Authors :
Lee, Min A Department of Trauma - Gachon University Gil Medical Center - Incheon, Korea , Choi, Kang Kook Department of Trauma - Gachon University Gil Medical Center - Incheon, Korea , Yu, Byungchul Department of Trauma - Gachon University Gil Medical Center - Incheon, Korea , Park, Jae Jeong Department of Trauma - Gachon University Gil Medical Center - Incheon, Korea , Park, Youngeun Department of Trauma - Gachon University Gil Medical Center - Incheon, Korea , Gwak, Jihun Department of Trauma - Gachon University Gil Medical Center - Incheon, Korea , Lee, Jungnam Department of Trauma - Gachon University Gil Medical Center - Incheon, Korea , Jeon, Yang Bin Department of Trauma - Gachon University Gil Medical Center - Incheon, Korea , Ma, Dae Sung Department of Trauma - Gachon University Gil Medical Center - Incheon, Korea , Lee, Gil Jae Department of Trauma - Gachon University Gil Medical Center - Incheon, Korea
Abstract :
Background: The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scoring system and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scoring system are widely used for critically ill patients. We evaluated whether APACHE II score and SOFA score predict the outcome for trauma patients in the intensive care unit (ICU).
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed trauma patients admitted to the ICU in a single trauma center between January 2014 and
December 2015. The APACHE II score was figured out based on the data acquired from the first 24 hours of admission; the SOFA score
was evaluated based on the first 3 days in the ICU. A total of 241 patients were available for analysis. Injury Severity score, APACHE II
score, and SOFA score were evaluated.
Results: The overall survival rate was 83.4%. The non-survival group had a significantly high APACHE II score (24.1 ± 8.1 vs. 12.3 ± 7.2,
P < 0.001) and SOFA score (7.7 ± 1.7 vs. 4.3 ± 1.9, P < 0.001) at admission. SOFA score had the highest areas under the curve (0.904).
During the first 3 days, SOFA score remained high in the non-survival group. In the non-survival group, cardiovascular system, neurological system, renal system, and coagulation system scores were significantly higher.
Conclusions: In ICU trauma patients, both SOFA and APACHE II scores were good predictors of outcome, with the SOFA score being
the most effective. In trauma ICU patients, the trauma scoring system should be complemented, recognizing that multi-organ failure
is an important factor for mortality.
Keywords :
APACHE II , intensive care units , mortality , multiple trauma , Sequential Organ Failure Assessment