Author/Authors :
Yang, Jeong Hoon Department of Critical Care Medicine and Medicine - Samsung Medical Center - Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine - Seoul, Korea
Abstract :
Abnormal liver chemistry tests indicating hepatic dysfunction are a common finding in critically ill patients [1]. Hepatobiliary enzyme levels interpreted in isolation convey information
on the level of ongoing injury; bilirubin, albumin, and international normalized ratio convey
information on liver function; and platelets convey information on severity of fibrosis [2]. Hepatic dysfunction must be interpreted in the clinical context of a given patient because the
numerous liver biomarkers indicate different pathways of hepatic dysfunction and can be influenced by extrahepatic factors such as age, diet, or pregnancy [3]. Particularly, hepatic dysfunction is closely related to clinical outcome in the critically ill and is included in most of the
widely used clinical risk scoring systems in the setting of intensive care unit such as Acute
Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II; cirrhosis as a factor), Sequential
Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA; bilirubin as components), or Simplified Acute Physiology
Score (SAPS; bilirubin as components) [4]. Hypoalbuminemia, which is a component variable in APACHE III, was also related to clinical outcome in acute ill patients and its association may reflect nutritional status and inflammation [5]. Accordingly, we suspect that the
prognostic power of bilirubin/albumin ratio would be better than that of bilirubin or albumin
alone.