Title of article :
Smoking cessation using preference-based tools: a mixed method pilot study of a novel intervention among smokers with low socioeconomic position
Author/Authors :
Héron, Mégane Social Epidemiology Departement - Sorbonne Université - INSERM UMR_S 1136 - Institut Pierre Louis d’Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique IPLESP, Paris, France , Le Faou, Anne-Laurence Centre Ambulatoire d’Addictologie - DMU Psychiatrie et Addictologie - Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, APHP.Centre, Paris, France , Ibanez, Gladys Social Epidemiology Departement - Sorbonne Université - INSERM UMR_S 1136 - Institut Pierre Louis d’Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique IPLESP, Paris, France , Métadieu, Brigitte Association Charonne, Paris, France , Melchior, Maria Social Epidemiology Departement - Sorbonne Université - INSERM UMR_S 1136 - Institut Pierre Louis d’Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique IPLESP, Paris, France , El-Khoury Lesueur, Fabienne Social Epidemiology Departement - Sorbonne Université - INSERM UMR_S 1136 - Institut Pierre Louis d’Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique IPLESP, Paris, France
Pages :
10
From page :
1
To page :
10
Abstract :
Background Compared to smokers with favorable socio-economic position (SEP), those with low SEP are less likely to have a successful smoking cessation attempt. Tailored approaches are therefore needed, and general practitioners could help reaching and assisting usually hard-to-reach population. Method STOP (Sevrage Tabagique à l’aide d’Outils dédiés selon la Préférence) is a pilot study, examining the feasibility, acceptability and potentiality of a smoking cessation intervention centered on smoker’s preference. Smokers with low SEP, wishing to quit, were recruited in six healthcare centers in the Greater Paris area. They were asked to choose between different types of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) products and/or e-cigarette with liquids delivered free of charge to aid their smoking cessation attempt. We describe the characteristics of recruited participants, their perception of smoking cessation aids, and the evolution of their smoking status 4 to 6 weeks after recruitment. Results We recruited 49 participants, of which 29% chose an e-cigarette, 29% chose NRT and 42% chose both an e-cigarette and NRT. The intervention was shown to be acceptable by participants and health professionals. Among the 24 participants followed for at least one month, 14 (28% of all participants) stopped smoking, and 9 (18%) considerably reduced their consumption. Conclusion The STOP intervention is feasible and acceptable, even if more efforts should be made to limit lost-to-follow-up. This preference-based intervention also shows interesting prospect in helping smokers with low SEP quit smoking. We will test the efficacy of this preference-based intervention in a randomized controlled trial.
Farsi abstract :
فاقد چكيده فارسي
Keywords :
Smoking cessation , Pilot study , Health disparities , NRT , Electronic cigarette
Journal title :
Addiction Science and Clinical Practice
Serial Year :
2021
Full Text URL :
Record number :
2623418
Link To Document :
بازگشت