Title of article :
Team-based learning: assessing the impact on anatomy teaching in People’s Republic of China
Author/Authors :
Yan, Junhao Department of Anatomy and Histology - School of Basic Medical Sciences - Peking University - Beijing 100191, People’s Republic of China , Liu, E Department of Anatomy and Histology - School of Basic Medical Sciences - Peking University - Beijing 100191, People’s Republic of China , Zhang, Yixuan Department of Anatomy and Histology - School of Basic Medical Sciences - Peking University - Beijing 100191, People’s Republic of China , Luan, Yingjie Department of Anatomy and Histology - School of Basic Medical Sciences - Peking University - Beijing 100191, People’s Republic of China , Qin, Lihua Department of Anatomy and Histology - School of Basic Medical Sciences - Peking University - Beijing 100191, People’s Republic of China , Zhou, Changman Department of Anatomy and Histology - School of Basic Medical Sciences - Peking University - Beijing 100191, People’s Republic of China , Zhang, Weiguang Department of Anatomy and Histology - School of Basic Medical Sciences - Peking University - Beijing 100191, People’s Republic of China , Ding, Xinling Medical College - Neimenggu, People’s Republic of China , Xiong, Lili School of Basic Medical Sciences & Forensic Medicine - Sichuan University - Chengdu, People’s Republic of China
Pages :
6
From page :
589
To page :
594
Abstract :
In this study, the effects of team-based learning (TBL) method on the anatomy course for students in People’s Republic of China were assessed. Methods The students were randomly divided into the traditional lecture-based teaching group (traditional learning [TL] group, 99 students) and TBL teaching group (98 students). The TBL method required the students to prepare the assigned content in advance and discuss some specific topics in small groups. The test scores and questionnaire were applied to evaluate the effects of the two methods. Results The students in TBL group had higher examination scores (81.70±8.53 vs 74.41±8.27, F[1,195] =124.6, p<0.01). The ratios of students with excellent (13.27% vs 9.09%, χ2[1] =4.00, p=0.041) and good scores (25.51% vs 16.16%, χ2[1] =4.85, p=0.027) were markedly increased in the TBL than the TL group, and the ratio of students who had just managed to pass was decreased (17.34% vs 32.33% in TL group, χ2[1] =5.91, p=0.015). The students in TBL group significantly achieved some improvement in mutual communication ability (χ2[1] =7.54, p=0.006), expression ability (χ2[1] =4.930, p=0.026), generalization capacity (χ2[1] =4.08, p=0.043), cooperative ability cultivation (χ2[1] =5.04, p=0.024), knowledge extension (χ2[1] =4.50, p=0.034), and enthusiasm mobilization (χ2[1] =4.27, p=0.039). Conclusion TBL could improve not only the test scores of the students, but also their study enthusiasm, initiative learning ability, communication ability, and team awareness.
Keywords :
team-based learning , lecture-based learning , student , anatomy
Journal title :
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Serial Year :
2018
Full Text URL :
Record number :
2624796
Link To Document :
بازگشت