Other language title :
تجزيه اثر متقابل ژنوتيپ × محيط براي عملكرد دانه جو با استفاده از روش GGE biplot
Title of article :
Interpretation of genotype × environment interaction for grain yield of barley using the GGE biplot method
Author/Authors :
Vaezi, Behrouz Kohgiluyeh and Boyerahmad Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center - Agricultural Research - Education and Extension Organization (AREEO) - Yasuj, Iran , Hatami Maleki, Hamid Department of Plant Production and Genetics - Faculty of Agriculture - University of Maragheh - Maragheh, Iran , Ahmadi, Ali Lorestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center - Agricultural Research - Education and Extension Organization (AREEO) - Khorram-Abad, Iran , Mehraban, Asghar Ardabil Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center - Agricultural Research - Education and Extension Organization (AREEO) - Parsabad, Iran , Mohammadi, Rahmatollah Golestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center - Agricultural Research - Education and Extension Organization (AREEO) - Gorgan, Iran , Sabzi, Zeinab IlamAgricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center - Agricultural Research - Education and Extension Organization (AREEO) - Ilam, Iran , Sabaghnia, Naser Department of Plant Production and Genetics - Faculty of Agriculture - University of Maragheh - Maragheh, Iran
Pages :
11
From page :
109
To page :
119
Abstract :
The identification of the most favorable cultivar(s) with high yield and stable performance is usually done based on the analysis of the genotype × environment (GE) interaction. The yield stability of 16 barley lines with two check varieties was studied in a randomized complete block design with four replications across three years at five locations in a multi-environment trial layout. The dataset was analyzed with a GGE (genotype main effect (G) + GE interaction) biplot method. Results indicated that the first two principal components (PCs) explained 81, 78 and 71% of the GGE sum of squares for 2017, 2018 and 2019 growing seasons, respectively. According to the average environment coordinate abscissa, G2, G13 and G18 were the best genotypes in terms of grain yield in years 2017 and 2018 while genotypes G2, G7 and G14 were the highest yielding genotypes in 2019. When both yield performance and stability were considered simultaneously, the G2 and G13 genotypes in 2017 and G2, G8 and G13 in 2018, were closer to the ideal genotype. In 2019, G2, G7 and G14 were the best in terms of grain yield and stability. In the "which-won-where pattern", the five locations in 2017 fell into four sectors with different winning genotypes as G2, G5, G14 and G13. In 2018, the five locations fell into three sectors in which G2, G4 and G17 were the highest yielding genotypes while in 2019, locations were positioned in four sectors and G2, G7, G10 and G13 were chosen as the winning genotypes. However, for practical use of the “which-won-where” pattern, the mean performance of genotypes over three years in the five test locations was taken into account. Although the results revealed six mega-environments, by neglecting small differences, we can assume only one mega-environment in which G2 (the check variety Khorram) was the best performing genotype.
Farsi abstract :
شناسايي مطلوبترين رقم­ هاي پرمحصول با عملكرد پايدار معمولاً از طريق تجزيه اثر متقابل ژنوتيپ × محيط انجام مي­ گيرد. در اين پژوهش پايداري عملكرد 16 لاين جو به همراه دو رقم شاهد در قالب طرح بلوك­ هاي كامل تصادفي با چهار تكرار در طي سه سال و پنج مكان به صورت آزمايش­ هاي چند-محيطي مطالعه شد. داده ­ها با استفاده از روش GGE-biplot (اثر اصلي ژنوتيپ + اثر متقابل ژنوتيپ و محيط) تجزيه و تحليل شدند. نتايج نشان داد كه دو مولفه اول تجزيه به مولفه هاي اصلي 81، 78 و 71 درصد از تغييرات مجموع مربعات GGE را به ترتيب در سال هاي زراعي 1396، 1397 و 1398 توجيه نمودند. بر اساس محور محيط متوسط، ژنوتيپ­ هاي G2، G13 و G18 به عنوان بهترين ژنوتيپ­ ها از نظر عملكرد در سال­ هاي 1397 و 1396 منظور شدند. در حالي كه G2، G14 و G7 پرمحصول ترين ژنوتيپ ­ها در سال 1398 بودند. زماني كه هر دو مقوله عملكرد و پايداري به طور هم­زمان لحاظ شدند، ژنوتيپ­ هاي G2 و G13 در سال 1396 و ژنوتيپ­ هاي G2، G8 و G13 در سال 1397 به موقعيت ژنوتيپ ايده­آل نزديك بودند. در سال 1398 ژنوتيپ ­هاي G2، G7 و G14 از نظر عملكرد و پايداري در حد مطلوبي بودند. در الگوي چي؟ برتر؟ كجا؟ 5 مكان مربوط به سال 1396 در 4 بخش مختلف قرار گرفتند و ژنوتيپ­ هاي راس برتر شامل G2، G5، G14 و G13 بودند. در سال 1397، 5 مكان در 3 بخش مختلف واقع شدند و ژنوتيپ­ هاي راس برتر پرمحصول شامل G2، G4 و G14 بودند. در حالي كه در سال 1398 مكان­ ها در 4 بخش قرار گرفتند و ژنوتيپ­ هاي G2، G7، G10 و G13 به عنوان ژنوتيپ­ هاي مطلوب شناسايي شدند. در عين حال، الگوي چي؟ برتر؟ كجا؟ بر اساس ميانگين ژنوتيپ­ ها در سه سال براي 5 مكان نيز ترسيم شد و نتايج شش ابرمحيط را آشكاركرد كه با كمي اغماض در مجموع مي­ توان يك ابرمحيط را در نظر گرفت و ژنوتيپ G2 (رقم شاخد خرم) بهترين ژنوتيپ در مجموعه اين محيط­ ها بود.
Keywords :
Barley , GGE biplot , Grain yield , Multi-environment trials , Singular value decomposition
Journal title :
Journal of Plant Physiology and Breeding
Serial Year :
2020
Record number :
2629556
Link To Document :
بازگشت