Author/Authors :
PAPASTEFANOU, Sotiris James Cook University Hospital - Unit for Spinal Surgery, Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, UK , PAPASTEFANOU, Sotiris Athens Medical Centre - Department of Spinal Surgery, Greece , ALPANTAKI, Kalliopi University Hospital of Heraklion - Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Greece , ALPANTAKI, Kalliopi James Cook University Hospital - Unit for Spinal Surgery, Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, UK , AKRA, Gabriel James Cook University Hospital - Unit for Spinal Surgery, Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, UK , KATONIS, Pavlos University Hospital of Heraklion - Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Greece
Abstract :
Objective: Our aim was to determine the best preoperative prognostic score to safely propose operative intervention for patients with metastatic spinal disease.Methods: This prospective cohort study included 52 consecutive patients who underwent surgery between 1997 and 2007 to alleviate pain and preserve or restore neurological function. All patients were prospectively evaluated with the Tokuhashi score and retrospectively with the Tomita score to compare their surgery indications. The relationship between the scores and overall survival time were compared. P values of less than 0.05 were considered significant.Results: In predicting survival time, the Tokuhashi score was statistically significant (r=0.574, p=0.01),and the Tomita score borderline significant (r=-0.394, p=0.05). For overall survival after initial diagnosis,the Tokuhashi score was borderline significant for survival (r=0.380, p=0.05) and the Tomita score was not significant.Conclusion: The prognostic Tokuhashi score appears to be more valuable for surgical indications than the Tomita score in patients with spinal metastases.
