Title of article :
Recharge pattern of contemporary glass ionomer restoratives
Author/Authors :
Arbabzadeh-Zavareh, Farahnaz isfahan university of medical sciences - School of Dentistry - Dental Research Center and Department of Operative Dentistry, ايران , Gibbs, Tim The University of Queensland - School of Dentistry - Department of General Dentistry, Australia , Meyers, Ian A. The University of Queensland - School of Dentistry - Department of General Dentistry, Australia , Bouzari, Majid university of isfahan - Faculty of Science - Department of Biology, اصفهان, ايران , Mortazavi, Shiva isfahan university of medical sciences - School of Dentistry - Dental Research Center and Department of Pediatric Dentistry, ايران , Walsh, Laurence J. The University of Queensland - School of Dentistry - Department of General Dentistry, Australia
From page :
139
To page :
145
Abstract :
Background: As glass ionomers have the ability to reload fluoride from outside sources, the aim was to compare the recharge pattern of six glass ionomer cements after exposure to fluoride. Materials and Methods: Fuji VII, Fuji IX, Riva Pink, Riva Bleach, Ketac Fil and Fuji IX Extra were investigated.The fluoride-containing materials used were tooth paste and mouth wash (Colgate). Specimens of each material (n=15) were immersed separately in deionized water for 59 days. Then the samples of each material were divided into three groups of five each.Two groups were recharged for 2, 20 and 60 min daily during three consecutive weekly intervals and then no treatment for one week.The third group was used as control.Fluoride release measurements (μg/cm2/day) were made in every 24 h. One-way and repeated measures analysis of variance tests were used. Results: Tooth paste recharged materials showed higher level of recharge.On day 1,the difference of fluoride release from different treatment groups of different materials except for Fuji IX Extra were not significant (P 0.05). On days 7 and 14, the differences observed were significant (P 0.05) for all materials except for Fuji VII (tooth paste versus mouth wash) and Trial Fuji IX (mouth wash versus control) and on day 14 for Rvia Pink (mouth wash versus control). On days 21 and 28, the differences observed were significant for all the materials (P 0.05) except for Riva Pink (toothpaste versus mouth wash), Riva Bleach, Ketac Fil and Trial FujiI X (mouth wash versus control) on day 28. Conclusion: A time tabled schedule of application of fluoride-containing materials could help to achieve high fluoride release.
Keywords :
Glass ionomer cements , mouth wash , recharge , toothpaste
Journal title :
DRJ Dental Research Journal
Journal title :
DRJ Dental Research Journal
Record number :
2636497
Link To Document :
بازگشت