Title of article :
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern of Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Against Newly Marketed Antibiotics: A Report From Imam Reza Hospital of Mashhad, Iran
Author/Authors :
Arianpoor ، Arash Mashhad Medical Microbiology Student Research Group - Student Research Committee - Mashhad University of Medical Sciences , Estaji ، Fatemeh Mashhad Medical Microbiology Student Research Group - Student Research Committee - Mashhad University of Medical Sciences , Naderinasab ، Mahboubeh Microbiology Laboratory, Central Laboratory - Imam Reza Hospital , Askari ، Emran Mashhad Medical Microbiology Student Research Group - Student Research Committee - Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
From page :
22
To page :
25
Abstract :
Background: Infections due to Staphylococcus aureus have long been considered as a big challenge to clinicians. The innate ability of this microorganism to develop resistance to different antibiotics, has led to the appearance of MRSA (methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus) and lately VRSA (vancomycinresistant Staphylococcus aureus) strains, which are considered as major problems for both patients and clinicians. Objectives: In this study, we tried to evaluate susceptibility pattern of S. aureus isolates against some prevalent antibiotics as well as some infrequent ones. Materials and Methods: This inquiry was performed on 238 clinical samples, collected from different wards of Imam Reza Hospital of Mashhad between 2011 and 2012, which were previously defined as S. aureus and stocked in 70°C. KirbyBauer’s disc diffusion was performed for the following antibiotics: quinupristindalfopristin, linezolid, cefoxitin and mupirocin according to EUCAST 2014 (v. 4), cotrimoxazole, doxycycline, tigecycline, oxacillin based on CLSI 2012 (M100S22) and vancomycin according to CLSI 2007 guidelines. Results: Out of 238 samples, 5.88% were resistant to quinupristindalfopristin; 5.46% to linezolid; 60.92% to Cotrimoxazole; 31.93% to doxycycline; 18.90% to tigecycline; 5.04% to vancomycin; 9.24% to mupirocin; 43% to oxacillin and 46.21% of our isolates were resistant to cefoxitin. Conclusions: Coming across isolates with reduced susceptibility to quinupristindalfopristin and resistant to linezolid in this study are worrisome although these antibiotics are not used in our hospital. This might be a new challenge in the treatment of MRSA.
Keywords :
Methicillin , Vancomycin , Quinupristin , Dalfopristin , Linezolid , Methicillin , Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Staphylo , coccus aureus
Journal title :
Razavi International Journal of Medicine
Journal title :
Razavi International Journal of Medicine
Record number :
2650242
Link To Document :
بازگشت