Author/Authors :
Mohajerzadeh, Leily Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences - Tehran, Iran , Mahdavi, Alireza Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences - Tehran, Iran , Mirsepasi, Sepehr Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences - Tehran, Iran , Ghoroubi, Javad Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences - Tehran, Iran , Hatefi, Sayeh Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences - Tehran, Iran , Khalili, Nazanin Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences - Tehran, Iran , Sarafi, Mehdi Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences - Tehran, Iran , Zakeri, Amir Mohammad Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences - Tehran, Iran
Abstract :
Introduction: Laparoscopic appendectomy has recently been trended to
be performed by using a less trocar technique. In children, appendectomy
is performed more by open approach; so this study was designed to
compare benefits of non-invasive laparoscopic appendectomy with
usual open technique.
Materials and Methods: After obtaining institutional review board
approval, from 2015 to 2018, 73 children with acute, nonperforated
appendicitis were treated by single-incision laparoscopic or open
approach. The patients were randomized to two treatment groups: 36
patients underwent open operation, and 37 by laparoscopic approach
via single-incision in umbilicus. 3 cases of laparoscopic approach were
converted to open surgery and removed from the study. In patient
selection, cases of complicated appendicitis confirmed by imaging
modalities were excluded. The outcomes were investigated in both
groups by length of operation, duration of hospital stay, presence of
postoperative fever, wound infection, ileus after operation, and pelvic
abscess after surgery.
Results: 73 appendectomies were carried out totally by single surgeon,
37 were single-incision laparoscopy and 36 underwent open procedure.
Total anesthesia time and duration of operation showed significantly
longer in the laparoscopic group. On the other hand, time to tolerate
liquid diet was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group. The duration of hospital stay showed similar duration in both groups. No
mortality occurred in the study. Overall complications demonstrated no
significant difference between two groups. Also there was no difference
in infectious complications between the laparoscopic group and the
open group.
Conclusion: Our study suggests that Assisted Transumbilical laparoscopic
appendectomy is a reasonable alternative to open surgery for appendicitis
in acute none ruptured condition. All analyzed complications were
similar between the groups, suggesting that Assisted Transumbilical
laparoscopic appendectomy is a suitable ingrained method in pediatric
cases with appendicitis.