Title of article :
A Comparison of the Apical Extrusion of Debris during the Preparation of Root Canal with Medin, RaCe, and ProTaper Rotary Systems
Author/Authors :
Nabavizadeh ، Mohammadreza Dept. of Endodontics - Oral and Dental Disease Research Center, School of Dentistry - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences , Shokouhi ، Mohammad Mehdi Dept. of Endodontics - School of Dentistry - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences , Kheirandish ، Mojgan School of Dentistry - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences , Sahebi ، Safoora Dept. of Endodontics - School of Dentistry - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences , Sadatshojaee ، Nooshin Dept. of Endodontics - School of Dentistry - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences , Abbaszadegan ، Abbas Dept. of Endodontics - School of Dentistry - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
From page :
193
To page :
197
Abstract :
Statement of the Problem: The extrusion of intracanal debris is one of the challenging problems related to almost all root canal preparation systems, which may cause flare-ups and impairment in the healing process. Purpose: This study was conducted to evaluate the amount of apically-extruded debris during root canal preparation using Medin (MEDIN Co., Czech Republic) rotary system compared with two common rotary systems, including ProTaper (Dentsply Maillefer., Swit-zerland) and RaCe (FKG Dentaire, Switzerland). Materials and Method: In this in vitro study, Sixty mandibular premolars with single canal were randomly assigned to three groups (n=20). The root canals were prepared with Medin, ProTaper, and RaCe rotary instruments based on their manufacturers’ instructions. The debris were collected into pre- weighted Eppendorf tubes. The weight of the extruded debris was calculated by subtracting the pretreatment weight of the vials. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test at a 5% significance level. Results: Medin instrument caused significantly less debris extrusion in comparison with ProTaper and RaCe (p 0.05). The differences between the ProTaper and RaCe rotary sys-tems were not statistically significant (p= 0.752). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, Medin rotary system produced less apical extrusion than ProTaper and RaCe.
Keywords :
Apical extrusion , Debris , Endodontic treatment , Rotary file
Journal title :
Journal of Dentistry :Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
Journal title :
Journal of Dentistry :Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
Record number :
2668050
Link To Document :
بازگشت