Title of article :
Effects of Rhythmic and Simple Auditory Stimulations on Learning the Timing of Sequential Motor Task in Children With DCD
Author/Authors :
Dehnavi, Ahmad Department of Motor Behavior - Faculty of Sport Sciences - Ferdowsi University of Mashhad - Mashhad, Iran , Saberi Kakhaki, Alireza Department of Motor Behavior - Faculty of Sport Sciences - Ferdowsi University of Mashhad - Mashhad, Iran , Taheri Torbati, Hamidreza Department of Motor Behavior - Faculty of Sport Sciences - Ferdowsi University of Mashhad - Mashhad, Iran , Shahabi Kaeb, Mohammadreza Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences - Hakim Sabzevari University - Sabzevar, Iran
Abstract :
Introduction: Children and adolescents with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD)
usually fail to understand spatial awareness and motor timing. The present study assessed
Rhythmic Auditory Stimulations (RAS) and Simple Auditory Stimulations (SAS) to facilitate
the learning of timing in sequential motor task and recorded the results of their relative and
absolute timing errors.
Materials and Methods: 56 male students aged 9-12 years with DCD in Neyshabur city
were selected by diagnosing with the following tools: Teacher Motor Inventory, Parental
Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire, Movement Assessment Battery for
Children-Second (MABC-2 movement test), spatial-visual memory assessment, intelligence
assessment, RT test, and biopsychological health status evaluation. Then, they were divided
into RAS, SAS, control group 1 (visual), and control group 2. Moreover, a pretest score was
performed. Next, the training protocol was presented in 10 blocks of 5 attempts and the
acquisition test was performed. Finally, the retention and transfer tests were performed after
48 hours and 10 minutes, respectively.
Results: Based on the obtained results, a significant difference was observed between
the visual stimulation group and the RAS and SAS groups in relative and absolute timing
components (P≤0.05). However, no significant difference was reported between the rhythmic,
SAS, and visual-auditory stimulation groups in relative and absolute timing variables (P˃0.05).
Conclusion: Finally, no significant difference was observed between the RAS and simple
stimulations although the graphs displayed the effect of the first stimulation more than that
of the second one.
Keywords :
Acoustic Stimulation , Rhythmic , Sequntial motor task , Motor timing
Journal title :
Journal of Exercise Science and Medicine