Title of article :
Risk Factors Associated with Carotid Artery Puncture following Landmark-Guided Internal Jugular Vein Cannulation Attempts
Author/Authors :
Jankovic, Radmilo J. University of Nis - School of Medicine - Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Serbia , Pavlovic, Marija S. University of Nis - School of Medicine - Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Serbia , Stojanovic, Miodrag M. University of Nis - School of Medicine, Institute for Public Health - Department of Medical Statistics, Serbia , Stosic, Biljana S. University of Nis - School of Medicine - Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Serbia , Milic, Dragan J. Clinical Center Nis - Clinic for General Surgery, Serbia , Ignjatovic, Nebojsa S. Clinical Center Nis - Clinic for General Surgery, Serbia , Bogicevic, Angelina N. University of Nis - School of Medicine - Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Serbia , Djordjevic, Dragana R. University of Nis - School of Medicine - Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Serbia , Savic, Nenad N. University of Nis - School of Medicine - Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Serbia
From page :
562
To page :
566
Abstract :
Objective: The relationship between certain risk factors and carotid artery puncture (CAP) as an early mechanical complication following internal jugular vein cannulation attempts (IJVCAs) was evaluated. Methods: In a retrospective 1-year observational single-center study, 86 IJVCAs conducted in the operating room by 4 competent anesthesiologists were evaluated. Age, gender, puncture side, number of cannulation attempts, circumstances of the procedure and incidence of CAP were obtained from medical records. Results: Of the 86 IJVCAs performed in patients aged 18–75 years, CAP occurred in 8 (9.3%): 5 (5.8%) in patients 65 years and 3 (3.5%) in patients 65 years of age. CAP was not associated with patient’s age (p = 0.11) and gender (p = 0.76). Multiple cannulation attempts (OR = 26.25; 95% CI = 4.52–152.51; p 0.001) and placement of CVC under emergency conditions (OR = 14.84; 95% CI = 1.73–127.22; p = 0.014) increased the risk for CAP significantly. Also, the risk for CAP was higher when IJVCAs were performed before induction of general anesthesia (OR = 15.75; 95% CI = 1.83–135.1; p = 0.019). CAP was more likely to happen during left-sided than right-sided IJVCA (OR = 5.98; 95% CI = 1.29–27.59; p = 0.022). In addition, left-sided attempts considerably increased the risk for multiple cannulation attempts (OR = 2.782; 95% CI = 1.342–3.965; p 0.01). Also, manifold cannulation attempts were more frequent if the IJVCA was performed before induction of anesthesia (OR = 4.219; CI = 1.579–11.271; p = 0.004). Conclusions: Our results strongly suggest that left-sided, multiple IJVCAs, performed under emergency conditions in conscious patients in the operating room, represent considerable risks for possible CAP.
Keywords :
Central venous cannulation , Complications , Anesthesia , Operating room
Journal title :
Medical Principles and Practice
Journal title :
Medical Principles and Practice
Record number :
2694785
Link To Document :
بازگشت