Title of article
The Effect of Slow Coronary Flow on Right and Left Ventricular Performance
Author/Authors
Altunkas, Fatih Gaziosmanpasa University - School of Medicine - Department of Cardiology, Turkey , Koc, Fatih Gaziosmanpasa University - School of Medicine - Department of Cardiology, Turkey , Ceyhan, Koksal Gaziosmanpasa University - School of Medicine - Department of Cardiology, Turkey , Celik, Atac Gaziosmanpasa University - School of Medicine - Department of Cardiology, Turkey , Kadi, Hasan Gaziosmanpasa University - School of Medicine - Department of Cardiology, Turkey , Karayakali, Metin Gaziosmanpasa University - School of Medicine - Department of Cardiology, Turkey , Ozbek, Kerem Gaziosmanpasa University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Cardiology, Turkey , Burucu, Turgay Gaziosmanpasa University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Cardiology, Turkey , Ozturk, Ahmet Gaziosmanpasa University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Cardiology, Turkey , Onalan, Orhan Gaziosmanpasa University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Cardiology, Turkey
From page
34
To page
39
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate left and right ventricular functions using tissue Doppler echocardiography (TDE) and myocardial performance index (MPI) methods in patients with slow coronary flow (SCF) and to determine the relationship between these parameters and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count in SCF patients. Subjects and Methods: Thirty-five patients (20 males and 15 females) with SCF who underwent coronary angiography and 35 age- and sex-matched controls (14 males and 21 females) without SCF who underwent elective coronary angiography were enrolled in the study. Left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) functions were examined using conventional echocardiography and TDE. Results: LV systolic myocardial velocity (Sm), early myocardial velocity (Em), late myocardial velocity (Am), and Em/Am ratio were similar in both the SCF and control groups; however, isovolumetric relaxation time (IRT) was higher in the SCF group compared to the control group (IRT: 99 ± 17 vs. 88 ± 20; p = 0.01). In patients with SCF, LV MPI was higher than in the control group, but this was not statistically significant (0.61 ± 0.11 vs. 0.56 ± 0.12; p = 0.07). The RV tricuspid annular velocities and MPI were similar in the SCF and control groups. Conclusion: This study showed that SCF affected LV functions echocardiographically and could cause partially reduced LV performance. In addition, SCF did not affect RV functions echocardiographically.
Keywords
Right ventricular function , Left ventricular function , Myocardial performance index , Slow coronary flow , Tissue Doppler echocardiography , Coronary artery disease
Journal title
Medical Principles and Practice
Journal title
Medical Principles and Practice
Record number
2695142
Link To Document