Author/Authors :
Asilian, Ali Department of Dermatology - School of Medicine - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences - Isfahan, Iran , Hafezi, Hossein Department of Dermatology - School of Medicine - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences - Isfahan, Iran , Shahmoradi, Zabihollah Department of Dermatology - School of Medicine - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences - Isfahan, Iran , Faghihi, Gita Department of Dermatology - School of Medicine - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences - Isfahan, Iran , Siadat, Amir Hossein Department of Dermatology - School of Medicine - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences - Isfahan, Iran , Mozafarpoor, Samaneh Department of Dermatology - School of Medicine - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences - Isfahan, Iran , Mohaghegh, Fatemeh Department of Dermatology - School of Medicine - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences - Isfahan, Iran , Nasimi, Mojtaba Department of Dermatology - School of Medicine - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences - Isfahan, Iran , Talakoub, Mahboobeh Department of Dermatology - School of Medicine - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences - Isfahan, Iran
Abstract :
Background: Becker’s nevus syndrome (BNS) is a benign
hamartoma that is aesthetically bothersome and usually appears
during puberty. Various modalities of laser therapy alone or in
combination with other medications can be used for the treatment
of BNS, but no unified approach with an acceptable response is
yet available. The current study aimed to compare the outcomes
of Q-switched ruby 694 nm laser (QSRL) alone and in combination
with 4% topical flutamide for the management of BNS.
Methods: The current randomized clinical trial was conducted
on twenty-two BNS patients between 2016-2018. The patients
were randomly allocated to treatment with QSRL 694 nm alone
(group A) versus in combination with 4% topical flutamide (group
B). The QSRL was administered twice with four-week intervals
for both groups, while group B was also administered topical
flutamide 4% twice a day for eight weeks. The treatment outcomes
were assessed and compared at baseline and then within 4 and
8 weeks of commencing the interventions.
Results: The evaluation of the two groups in terms of lesion size
alterations, response to treatment, and patients’ satisfaction showed
insignificant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). In
addition, neither approach A (P = 0.33) nor approach B (P = 0.46)
led to remarkable changes in lesion color.
Conclusion: Based on the findings of the current study, the use
of QSRL alone or even in combination with topical 4% flutamide
was not suitable for the management of BNS lesions.
Keywords :
Becker’s nevus , Q-switched ruby laser , hamartoma , flutamide