Author/Authors :
Seaman, Andrew Department of Internal Medicine - Division of Addiction Medicine - Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, Oregon , Ronan, Wren Hepatitis C Program Manager - Central City Concern, Portland, Oregon , Myers, Lauren Department of Hepatology - Oregeon Health & Sciences University, Portland, Oregon , Wheelock, Haven Syringe Services - Outside In, Portland, Oregon , Butler, Melinda Pharmacy - Outside In, Portland, Oregon , Nelson, Lisa Central City Concern, Portland, Oregon , Williams, Beth E. Central City Concern, Portland, Oregon , Zaman, Atif Department of Gastroentrology and Hepatology - Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, Oregon
Abstract :
Background: Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) treatment in people who inject drugs (PWID) is a key component of elimination models but
PWID face substantial barriers to treatment access. Despite data showing treatment outcomes among PWID on medications for
opioid use disorder (MOUD) are similar to non-PWID outcomes, few studies examine PWID treatment outcomes with only syringe
services support.
Objectives: To evaluate the effect of recruitment for HCV treatment with elbasvir/grazoprevir (E/G) in a syringe services program
(SSP) as compared to an MOUD program for people with opioid use disorder.
Methods: This real-world, multi-site prospective open-label pilot study compares treatment of PWID with aspartate aminotransferase
to platelet ratio (APRI) < 0.7 and genotype 1a, 1b, and 4 HCV with E/G, engaged in MOUD (n = 25) or an SSP (n = 25). The MOUD
arm was enrolled through a federally qualified community health center and SSP arm through a nearby SSP. Prospective arms were
compared to an academic hepatology clinic group (n = 50). Sustained virologic response at 12 weeks (SVR12), medication adherence,
and treatment discontinuation were evaluated.
Results: In the MOUD vs SSP arms, substance use throughout treatment was found in 36% (9/25) vs 100% (25/25); good adherence (>
90% pills taken) in 100% (25/25) vs 68% (17/25); treatment completion 100% (25/25) vs 64% (16/25); and SVR12 rates were 96% (24/25) vs
60% (15/25). In the community standard comparison group, SVR12 was achieved in 94% (47/50). There were two virologic failures or
re-infections in the SSP group; all other non-responders were due to missing SVR12 data.
Conclusions: While recruitment and follow-up are challenging in SSPs, preliminary data suggests adherence, treatment completion,
and SVR12 are high in PWID treated with E/G engaging in SSP orMOUD. All metrics are comparable to community standards for
non-PWID for treatment of HCV with direct-antiviral drugs.
Keywords :
Hepatitis C , Substance-Related Disorders , Opioid-Related Disorders , Opiate Substitution Treatment , Needle-Exchange Programs , Communicable Diseases