Title of article :
CavatermTM plus treatment in high – risk surgical patients
Author/Authors :
Bouzari, Zinatossadat Cellular and Molecular Biology Research Center - Health Research Institute - Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol , Alijanpour, Ebrahim The Clinical Research Development Unite of Ayatollah Rouhani Hospital - Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol , Yazdani, Shahla Fertility and Infertility Research Health Center - Health Research Institute- Babol of University of Medical Science, Babol , Ghanbarpour, Azita Fertility and Infertility Research Health Center - Health Research Institute- Babol of University of Medical Science, Babol , Bijani, Ali Social Determinants of Health Research Center - Health Research Institute- Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol , Ashraf Ganjoei, Tahereh Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology - Preventative Gynecology Research Center (PGRC) - Imam Hussein Medical Center- Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Gholinia, Hemmat Health Research Institute - Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol
Abstract :
Background: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of
thermal balloon ablation in women with high anesthetic and surgical risk compared to
invulnerable women according to the American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) physical status
stratification.
Methods: This report was based on a retrospective cohort study of women with heavy
menstrual bleeding (HMB) who were eligible for treatment with CavatermTM plus during
2012-2017. Women were classified as high-risk (HR) or low-risk (LR) cohorts based on
ASA physical status stratification. The primary outcome includes amenorrhea in the twelfth
months after the treatment. Risk adjustments were performed using regression models.
Results: This research study consisted of 63 women with mean age 44.42±5.48. Mean of
body mass index (BMI) in the HR cohort was higher than the LR cohort (31.48±6.22 vs
26.83± 3.51, P=0.005) and results were also similar considering the uterine length (mm)
between HR and LR women (58.27±35.70 vs 30.92± 35.30, P=0.01). The primary outcome
of treatment after a one-year follow-up in the two groups (HR and LR) was 31 (93.9%) and
15 (78.9%), respectively. After adjusting for known confounders including age, uterine
length, parity, dysmenorrheal, the adjusted odds ratio was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.14– 2.5; P= 0.60).
Conclusion: For women with high anesthetic and surgical risks derived from serious
underlying co morbidities, endometrial ablation can provide a minimally invasive, safe, and
effective therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding.
Keywords :
Endometrial ablation , Menorrhagia , Amenorrhea , Recovery , Anesthesia , Obese women
Journal title :
Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine (CJIM)