Title of article :
Participation in Health Legislation: A Comparative Study of Participation Mechanisms in the Selected Countries and Iran.
Author/Authors :
Akhavan Behbahani, Ali Department of Health Services Administration - South Tehran Branch - Islamic Azad University, Tehran , Masoudiasl, Irvan Department of Health - Islamic Parliament Research Center of the I.R.I, Tehran , Hessam, Somayeh Department of Health Services Administration - South Tehran Branch - Islamic Azad University, Tehran , Najafikhah, Mohesn graduate
Abstract :
Background: Health legislation provides a framework to implement various health policies. Participatory democracy in healthcare
is inevitable. Citizensandhealth professionals should participate in participatorydemocracy, andhealth lawsshouldbethe result of
a process in which participatory instruments and techniques have a prominent role. Health democracy can be achieved through the
expansion of mechanisms for citizens’ participation in the legislative process. The health democracy enables citizens to participate
in the decision-making process and to have equal access to services provided by the public health system.
Objectives: The current study aims to assess participatory mechanisms used by selected countries to participate their citizens in
legislative processes.
Methods: The current study is a comparative study of the legislative processes of selected countries. To select countries, four issues
were evaluated: (a) overall legal system; (b) how laws enforce; (c) legislative backgrounds; and (d) health system basic model.
Results: Thenumberof legislative chambers, legislative initiatives, legislative authorities and institutions, legislative commissions,
and citizens’ participation in the legislative process were analyzed in the selected countries. An analysis of the factors affecting public
participation in healthcare legislation shows that participation in the legislative process is a complex phenomenon influenced
by social, legal, cultural, political, and sovereignty factors. This phenomenon cannot be analyzed isolated from these factors. However,
the way should be paved for citizens’ participation. The selected countries use different methods for citizens’ participation,
depending on their legal systems.
Conclusions: Research results show that there are various public participation mechanisms. In Iran, there is a huge potential for
public participation, and members of the parliament can easily interact with the interest groups and relevant individuals. These
conditions provide a golden opportunity for expert health legislation.
Keywords :
Legislation , Participation , Comparative Study , Health System
Journal title :
Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal