Title of article :
Contralateral and Lateral Views: Analysis of the Technical Aspects of Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Insertion
Author/Authors :
Gill ، Jatinder Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine - Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center - Harvard Medical School , Kohan ، Lynn Department of Anesthesia - Medical Center - University of Virginia , Hasoon ، Jamal Department of Anesthesia - Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center - Harvard Medical School , Urits ، Ivan Department of Anesthesia - Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center - Harvard Medical School , Viswanath ، Omar Department of Anesthesiology - Louisiana State University Health Shreveport , Sadegi ، Kambiz Department of Anesthesiology - Zabol University of Medical Sciences , Orhurhu ، Vwaire Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine - Medical Center - University of Pittsburgh , Lee ، Anthony C Department of Anesthesia - Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center - Harvard Medical School , Aner ، Musa M Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine - Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center - Dartmouth Medical School , Simopoulos ، Thomas T. Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine - Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center - Harvard Medical School
From page :
1
To page :
7
Abstract :
Background: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an established treatment modality for neuropathic pain. The critical part of this technique is safe access to the epidural space for lead placement. There have been innovations in radiological views, improving access to the epidural space. Objectives: This study analyzes the adoption of these technical advantages in daily practice Methods: We conducted a survey of members in the Spine Intervention Society and American Society of Regional Anesthesia in regard to the practice patterns in SCS therapy. Here we present our findings regarding the use of contralateral oblique (CLO) and lateral views as well direct upper thoracic or cervicothoracic access for SCS lead insertion Results: A total of 195 unique responses were received between March 20, 2020 and June 26, 2020. Forty-five percent of respondents “always used” the lateral view technique while 15% “always used” CLO view for SCS lead insertion. Overall, sixty-five percent of respondents used the CLO view with varying frequency. Cervical and upper thoracic approach for cervical SCS lead placement is always or often used by 66.8% of the respondents. Conclusions: A depth view (CLO or lateral) is always used by only 45 - 60% of the respondents and CLO view has been rapidly adopted in clinical practice for SCS lead insertion. Direct cervicothoracic and upper thoracic is the preferred approach for cervical lead placement by the majority.
Keywords :
Contralateral Oblique , Lateral , Spinal Cord Stimulation , Fluoroscopy , Neurological Injury , Standard of Care
Journal title :
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Journal title :
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Record number :
2709411
Link To Document :
بازگشت