Author/Authors :
NAYAK B, SHIVANANDA Subbaiah Institute of Medical Sciences - Purle - Shivamogga - Karnataka, India - Faculty of Medical Sciences - The University of the West Indies - St Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago , SRIDEVI, VINEETH Subbaiah Institute of Medical Sciences - Purle - Shivamogga - Karnataka, India , SAHU, PRADEEPKUMAR Faculty of Medical Sciences - The University of the West Indies - St Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago , SUBBARAMAIAH, NAGENDRA Subbaiah Institute of Medical Sciences - Purle - Shivamogga - Karnataka, India , TELANG, LATHA Subbaiah Institute of Medical Sciences - Purle - Shivamogga - Karnataka, India , GOUDAPPALA, PRASHANTHKUMAR Subbaiah Institute of Medical Sciences - Purle - Shivamogga - Karnataka, India , HALAPPA KARIAPPA, CHANDRAKANTH Subbaiah Institute of Medical Sciences - Purle - Shivamogga - Karnataka, India , SHARMA, AKANKSHA Subbaiah Institute of Medical Sciences - Purle - Shivamogga - Karnataka, India , SAGARI K, MAANASA Subbaiah Institute of Medical Sciences - Purle - Shivamogga - Karnataka, India , NAYAK, AKASH S Kasturba Medical College - Manipal Academy of higher education - Manipal, Karnataka, India
Abstract :
Introduction: Small group teaching is an educational strategy that may be used to facilitate learning. Tutorials enable an adult
approach toward learning where students take responsibility
for their own learning. We aimed to investigate the students’
engagement and perceptions of small group tutorial classes among
undergraduate medical students.
Methods: A cross‑sectional, descriptive survey was conducted at
the Subbaiah Institute of Medical Sciences, where we collected
the data from 300 undergraduate students using convenience
sampling method. A self‑administered questionnaire consisting
of 22 items which was piloted on 20 students, and six experienced
medical educators were consulted for face validation. The internal
consistency of the questionnaire measured by Cronbach’s alpha
reliability test was 0.80. It was used to measure the students’
perception on the effectiveness of tutorials with regard to learning
experience, teamwork, confidence, communication skills, and role
of the teacher. Statistical analyses included mean and standard
deviation for the description of each item, t‑test to compare the
mean scores for gender and class year, and one‑way analysis of
variance between groups for age group comparisons using SPSS
version 24 software.
Results: Students’ overall perceptions of small group teaching
effectiveness showed that tutorials were beneficial to their learning
process (mean: 3.61±0.50). The majority of the students have
positive perceptions toward small group effectiveness, particularly
in learning experience (mean: 3.72±0.68) and teamwork (mean:
3.36±0.59). A significant difference was found between year 1 and
year 2 students with regards to learning experience (P<0.001),
teamwork (P<0.05), communication skills (P<0.05), and the role
of the tutor (P<0.001). Additionally, the mean scores, measuring
overall effectiveness of tutorials, for the 2nd year students were
significantly higher than that for the 1st year students (3.70±0.41
and 3.50±0.57, (P<0.001).
Conclusions: The data of this study show that tutorial is an
effective small group teaching method for medical students compared to large group teaching.
Keywords :
Faculty , Perception , Tutorial , Teaching