Stress System and Social Interaction Focusing on the Sexual Pathway

Privacy in the workplace as a social problem has recently become a significant issue; however, it did not attract much attention in the past (1). Heterosexual relationships that take place at work are inherently involuntary and unequal since men generally have more power, income, and possibilities than women, and women are often under harassment in the romances of the workplace (1, 2). In addition to harassment, romantic relationships at work can be led to declining productivity of organizations and team working as well as increasing some negative moral traits such as gossip, jealousy, and suspicion due to favoritism (1, 2). Then it is a serious question that whether sexual privacy is established between men and women. Sexual privacy can be referred to as wide matters such as type of the relationship between two genders, the appearance, and their body coverage, local culture, and religion but this paper focus on the global meaning of sexual privacy. In history, there has always been a change in the type of coverage and privacy that is the indication of the historical periods of each land (3). Therefore, the type of coverage and the scope of privacy are considered societies’ common indicators of their culture and social relationships. In fact, it is difficult to change a society’s behavior as it is already accepted as a custom (3). The scope of the sexual privacy of men and women can be discussed as a biological subject, in addition to the cultural, economic, and religious requirements so that the ultimate choice of society is an integration of all these factors. Then this letter proposed a neurobiological insight to social interaction of menandwomenas an opinion article. The different responses of genders to sexual stimulation and attractiveness are discussed.