Title of article
Quality of Life with Voice Prosthesis after Total Laryngectomy
Author/Authors
Massaro, Nicola Department of Biomedicine - Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostic - University of Palermo - Palermo (PA) Italy , Verro, Barbara Department of Biomedicine - Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostic - University of Palermo - Palermo (PA) Italy , Greco, Giuseppe Department of Biomedicine - Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostic - University of Palermo - Palermo (PA) Italy , Chianetta, Enzo Department of Biomedicine - Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostic - University of Palermo - Palermo (PA) Italy , D'Ecclesia, Aurelio ENT and Maxillo-Facial Clinic - IRCSS – Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza – San Giovanni Rotondo - Foggia (FG), Italy , Saraniti, Carmelo Department of Biomedicine - Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostic - University of Palermo - Palermo (PA) Italy
Pages
9
From page
301
To page
309
Abstract
The loss of voice after total laryngectomy is one of the main impairments in personal and social life. In order to prevent potential psycho-social consequences in the patient and his family, the restoration of phonatory function is the main objective of post-laryngectomy rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to assess quality of life in patients who received prosthetic voice after total laryngectomy. Materials and Methods: Over a one-year period, 51 patients with voice prostheses after total laryngectomy were recruited. 32 patients (62.74%) were administered radiation therapy and 9 patients (17.64%) underwent to surgical reconstruction with flaps. Each patient was administered the VHI-10 and V-RQOL self-assessment questionnaires. Results: The study showed that vocal restoration with voice prosthesis allows patients to recover a significant degree of quality of life after total laryngectomy. The average score on the V-RQOL questionnaire was 75.9 and on the VHI-10 questionnaire was 13.5. It has not been shown a statistically significant correlation between quality of life after tracheoesophageal prosthesis and radiation therapy, chemotherapy or reconstruction flaps. Younger patients showed, on average, a higher score at V-RQOL. These results allow to state that, after prosthetic rehabilitation, at least 75% of patients experienced an increase in quality of life. Moreover, the prosthetic technique (primary vs secondary) does not affect the long-term outcome and radiotherapy, chemotherapy or reconstruction flaps are not absolute contraindications to rehabilitation with voice prosthesis. Conclusion: After total laryngectomy, rehabilitation with tracheoesophageal prosthesis is a satisfactory choice to restore the patient’s ability to communicate verbally.
Keywords
Laryngectomy , Voice quality , Prostheses , Quality of life
Journal title
Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
Serial Year
2021
Record number
2713817
Link To Document