Abstract :
The performance of justice systems is measured by empirical indicators in
both developing and developed countries. The findings of existing indicator initiatives
have historically been based on surveys of experts, document reviews, administrative
data, or public surveys. In this paper, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Cluster
Analysis (CA) methods were combined to resolve the problem of evaluating multiple
indicators. Using PCA, this method standardizes, reduces dimensions, and decorrelates
multiple indicators of evaluation of justice systems and abstracts the principal
components. Then, CA is used to assign individuals (observations) to homogeneous
clusters (classes). Typically, hierarchical clustering on principal components (HCPC)
is employed to classify civil branches of a trial court in Iran to create a comprehensive
evaluation. By applying the multivariate statistical method to data, three principal
components are identified and interpreted. A hierarchical clustering algorithm is then
applied, which divides the data into three clusters based on dissimilarity. These groups
of the civil branches were identified based on nine judicial performance indicators. It
allows policymakers and reformers to measure the performance of each branch individually,
and track their progress in reducing backlogs and delays separately. As shown
by the practical example, these methods are effective across justice units.
Keywords :
Court performance indicators , Hierarchical clustering , K-means , Principal components