Title of article :
Recurrent Pterygium: A Review
Author/Authors :
Ghiasian, Leila Eye Research Center - The Five Senses Institute - Rassoul Akram Hospital - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Samavat, Bijan Eye Research Center - Farabi Eye Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Hadi, Yasaman Eye Research Center - The Five Senses Institute - Rassoul Akram Hospital - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Arbab, Mona Department of Radiation Oncology - Indiana University, Indiana, USA , Abolfathzadeh, Navid Alavi Eye Hospital - Faculty of Medicine - Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran - Eye Research Center - The Five Senses Institute - Rassoul Akram Hospital - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract :
Purpose: To summarize the recent evidence regarding different aspects of pterygium recurrence.
Methods: Human‑based studies from PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar were identified using the following keywords: conjunctival disease,
pterygium, recurrent pterygium, pterygium recurrence, pterygium management/surgery, conjunctival autograft (CAU), amniotic membrane
graft/transplant, and adjuvant therapy (January 2009 to February 2021). We reviewed risk factors associated with the recurrence of pterygium,
timing of recurrence, medical treatments to prevent from recurrence, and nonsurgical and surgical alternatives for management of recurrence.
Results: Dry eye disease, black race, and young age are considered definite risk factors for recurrence. However, fleshy appearance of the
pterygium and preoperative size remain controversial. Surgical techniques such as excessive suturing, insufficient conjunctival graft size, thick
conjunctival graft with remained Tenon tissue, and postoperative graft retraction are considered possible risk factors for recurrence. Using fibrin
glue instead of sutures can further reduce recurrence rates. Although recurrence could occur even after many years, most recurrences happen in
the first 3–6 months after surgery. Multiple kinds of adjuvant medications are used before, during, or after the operation including mitomycin
C (MMC), 5‑fluorouracil (5‑FU), corticosteroids, and anti‑vascular endothelial growth factors (anti‑VEGFs). Multiple weekly subconjunctival
5‑FU injections are shown to be safe and effective in halting the progression of recurrent pterygium. Although topical bevacizumab is found
to inhibit the growth of impending recurrent pterygium, the effect is mostly temporary. CAU is superior to amniotic membrane transplantation
in the treatment for recurrent pterygia.
Conclusions: There is yet to be a panacea in treating recurrent pterygium. Currently, there is not a globally accepted recommendation for
treating recurrent pterygium with anti‑VEGFs or 5‑FU as a nonsurgical treatment. We strongly recommend using MMC as an adjunct to surgery
in recurrent cases, with consideration of its specific complications. CAU is the most effective surgical treatment for recurrent pterygium, and
other new surgical therapies need further investigation.
Keywords :
Adjuvant therapy , Amniotic membrane graft/transplant , Conjunctival autograft , Conjunctival disease , Pterygium , Pterygium management , Pterygium recurrence , Recurrent pterygium , Risk factor
Journal title :
Journal of Current Ophthalmology