• Title of article

    Role of Osteoprotegerin as Novel Marker in Urinary Stone Formers: A Pilot Study

  • Author/Authors

    Dayapule, Sreedhar Department of Urology & Renal Transplantation - Dr. PSIMS & RF - NTRUHS University - Vijayawada - Andhra Pradesh, India , Parthasarathy Yamajala, SaiSwaroop Department of Urology & Renal Transplantation - Dr. PSIMS & RF - NTRUHS University - Vijayawada - Andhra Pradesh, India , Anand, Ankit Department of Urology & Renal Transplantation - Dr. PSIMS & RF - NTRUHS University - Vijayawada - Andhra Pradesh, India , Patankar, Ritvij Department of Urology & Renal Transplantation - Dr. PSIMS & RF - NTRUHS University - Vijayawada - Andhra Pradesh, India , Krishna, Bala Murali Department of Urology & Renal Transplantation - Dr. PSIMS & RF - NTRUHS University - Vijayawada - Andhra Pradesh, India , Rao Chadalawada, Nageswara Department of Urology & Renal Transplantation - Dr. PSIMS & RF - NTRUHS University - Vijayawada - Andhra Pradesh, India

  • Pages
    5
  • From page
    1
  • To page
    5
  • Abstract
    Background: Urinary tract calculus formation can be prevented by identifying molecules and metabolic disturbances that affect this process. Osteoprotegerin (OPG), a cytokine of the TNF receptor superfamily, has been demonstrated to mediate vascular calcification and intimal calcification. Endothelial injury and oxidative stress are known to play a role in urolithiasis in the form of Randall’s plaques. Objectives: The present study aimed to compare 24-h urinary and serum OPG levels of patients with and without urolithiasis. Methods: In this case-control study, 24-h urinary levels of OPG (pg/mL), serum levels of OPG (pg/mL), and creatinine (mg/dL) were measured in both groups. Urinary and serum levels of OPG were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using human OPG kits. Results: Mean serum creatinine was 0.86 0.21 mg/dL in the case group and 0.77 0.16 mg/dL in controls. The difference in the mean serum OPG levels between the cases (227.1398.02 pg/mL) and controls (47.2829.61 pg/mL) was highly significant (P value < 0.0001). The difference in the mean 24-h urinary OPG levels between the cases (156.12 174.31 pg/mL) and controls (9.32 23.72 pg/mL) was highly significant (P value < 0.001). Conclusions: There were significantly higher levels of OPG in serum and 24-h urine samples of cases than in controls. Hence, it requires further large studies to make OPG a diagnostic and prognostic marker.
  • Keywords
    Osteoprotegerin , Urinary Stone , Marker
  • Journal title
    Nephro- Urology Monthly
  • Serial Year
    2021
  • Record number

    2718753