Author/Authors :
Alidousti-Shahraki, Niloufar Student Research Center - Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences , Farzi, Sedigheh Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Centre - Department of Adult Health Nursing - Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences , Tarrahi, Mohammad Javad Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics - School of Health - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract :
Background: Safe care requires acquiring special competencies. Suitable instruments are needed to evaluate such competencies. Objectives: This study aimed to assess
the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Health Professionals
Education in Patient Safety Survey (H-PEPSS). Methods: A methodological study
was conducted in 2020, on the students who were spending their last year of study
in nursing, medicine, pharmacy, midwifery, surgical technology, and anesthesia,
in the Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. The H-PEPSS was translated into
Persian based on the Brislin translation model. Face validity, content validity index
(CVI), and content validity ratio (CVR) were examined. The construct validity of the
scale was assessed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor
analysis (CFA). Cronbach’s alpha coefficient and interclass correlation coefficient
were also calculated as reliability criteria. Results: The face validity of the Persian
translation of H-PEPSS was confirmed by a panel of experts, and the items’ impact
scores were greater than 1.5. Three items were modified, and the CVI of the scale
was calculated at 0.91. Besides, the items’ CVR ranged from 0.64 to 1.00. In EFA,
six factors were extracted, which shows the competencies the students possessed
both in the classroom and clinical setting, which then were confirmed through the
CFA. All items had a factor loading value greater than 0.4. Goodness-of-fit indices
were obtained: Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.064,
Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) = 0.922, and Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.931 for the
classroom and RMSEA = 0.076, TLI = 0.912, and CFI = 0.923 for clinical setting.
The Cronbach’s alpha of the scale was 0.936 for the classroom and 0.949 for the
clinical setting. Conclusions: The Persian version of H-PEPSS includes six factors
with 23 items. This scale is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing patient safety education in the classroom and clinical setting.
Keywords :
Health personnel , Iran , Patient safety , Psychometrics , Students , Survey