Author/Authors :
Ahmadi , Mehdi Department of Physiotherapy - University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Amiri , Mohsen Department of Physiotherapy - University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Rezaeian , Tahere Department of Physiotherapy - University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Abdollahi, Iraj Department of Physiotherapy - University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Rezadoost, Amir Mansour Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Sohrabi , Masoudreza Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease Research Center (GILDRC) - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Ir , Bakhshi, Enayatollah Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology , University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Sohrabi , Masoudreza Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease Re- search Center (GILDRC) - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Bakhshi, Enayatollah Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology - University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract :
BACKGROUND
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a worldwide disorder with an increasing
prevalence. The quality of life (QOL) of the patients may be influenced by reflux disease.
Diaphragmatic breathing (DB), as well as aerobic exercise (AE), may improve the symptoms
of reflux disease, although it remains a controversial issue. The aim of this study was to
compare the effects of AE and DB on QOL and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure of
patients with moderate to severe reflux.
METHODS
This was a case-control study that was conducted for 8 weeks among patients with
moderate to severe GERD. The block randomization method was designed to randomize
patients into three groups (AE, DB, and control) to achieve equal sample sizes. The
control group received omeprazole 20 mg once daily. The other groups, in addition to
omeprazole, received AE and DB. QOL and LES pressure were measured before and
after the study by Questionary and Manometry method, respectively.
RESULTS
75 patients were enrolled in this study. Positive effects of DB on LES pressure was
approved (p = 0.001). DB had significantly more effects on QOL than aerobic exercise (p =
0.003). AE can significantly improve QOL in patients (p = 0.02) but no significant change
in LES pressure (p = 0.38). There was no change in the control group for both variables.
CONCLUSION
AE had no effects on LES pressure but can improve QOL of the patients. DB had
more effects on QOL than AE, so injured or disable patients with reflux who cannot do
AE, can benefit from DB to improve their reflux symptoms.
Keywords :
Reflux , Manometry , Diaphragmatic breathing , Aerobic exercise , Quality of life , LES