Title of article :
A comparison of the JO-IMRT dose distribution calculated by the SOURCE 8 and 20 in the DOSXYZnrc for head-and-neck cancer
Author/Authors :
Tai, D.T Department of Industrial Electronics and Biomedical Engineering - Faculty of Electrical and Electronic Engineering - Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Education - Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam , Tuan, H.D Department of Oncology - University Medical Shing Mark Hospital - Bien Hoa, Vietnam , Oanh, L.T Department of Radiation Technology - Ho Chi Minh City Oncology Hospital - Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam , Naeem, H Department of Physics - Division of Science and Technology - University of Education - Lahore, Pakistan , Loan, T.T.H Faculty of Physics & Engineering Physics - VNUHCM-University of Science, Vietnam - Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam , Yani, S Department of Physics - Faculty of Mathematic and Natural Sciences - IPB University - Bogor 16680, Indonesia
Abstract :
Background: The purpose of this study is to compare SOURCE 8 and 20 in the EGSnrc-based DOSXYZnrc Monte Carlo code for Jaws-only intensitymodulated radiation therapy (JO-IMRT) dose distribution, and demonstrate the advantage of SOURCE 20 to SOURCE 8 to treat head-and-neck cancer.
Materials and Methods: The clinical photon beams of the HPD Siemens
Primus linear accelerator simulated using the BEAMnrc code and then verified
by measurement. The phase-space files generated by the BEAMnrc code were
used as an input for the DOSXYZnrc to calculate the JO-IMRT dose
distributions of patients (in form of CT images) using the SOURCES 8 and 20.
The isodose distribution on slices, DVH and gamma index (3%/3 mm, 2%/2
mm, and 1%/1 mm) were compared with Monte Carlo and treatment
planning system (TPS) results. Furthermore, the efficient computation of dose
distributions such as time running, working load and uncertainty error
calculation also considered for evaluation. Results: JO-IMRT dose
distributions calculated by SOURCE 8 and 20 compared with the Prowess
Panther TPS. The time running, working load based on SOURCE 20 were
significantly less than SOURCE 8. Futhermore, the uncertainty calculation
based on SOURCE 20 was also significantly less than SOURCE 8. Conclusion: The JO-IMRT dose distributions calculated by SOURCE 20 are more efficient than SOURCE 8.
Keywords :
JO – IMRT plan , Monte Carlo simulation , SOURCE 8 , SOURCE 20 , EGSnrc
Journal title :
International Journal of Radiation Research