Title of article :
Entrance dose determination and effective dose calculation in chest and skull radiographies: an experimental and computational study
Author/Authors :
Panahi, F Department of Medical Physics - School of Para medicine - Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran , Mohammadi, M Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering - School of Medicine - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Naserpour, F Department of Medical Physics - School of Para medicine - Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran , Hassanpour, N Department of Medical Physics - School of Para medicine - Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran , Gholami, M Department of Medical Physics - School of Para medicine - Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
Abstract :
Background: This study aimed to determine entrance surface dose (ESD), calculate effective dose (ED), organ dose, and local dose levels in three general hospitals of Khorramabad in
common diagnostic radiographic examinations, including Chest and Skull.
Materials and Methods: Exposure parameters and data of 110 patients
were collected during 6 months. In this study, three radiological devices
including Shimadzu R-20, Mehran Teb DMT II and Varian Rad-8, were
evaluated. Four radiographic views, including Chest posterior-anterior and
lateral projections (PA/LAT), and Skull PA/LAT were also assessed. The index
used for comparison and measurement of radiation dose was ESD measured
using thermo luminescent dosimeter (TLD). In this study, a pc program for Xray
Monte Carlo (PCXMC) software was used to calculate the organs’ dose
and effective dose. Results: The results obtained show that there is a
significant relationship between mAs and kVp changes with ED and ESD
values. ESD range in Chest PA, Chest LAT, Skull PA, and Skull LAT examinations
were 0.1075-0.8844, 0.2059-2.2997, 0.0729-1.44, and 0.03478-1.15 mGy,
respectively. In this study, the mean ESD estimated was lower than the
diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) recommended by the National Radiological
Protection Board (NRPB), the Commission of Europian Communities (CEC),
and International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), but the ED calculated was
relatively higher than other studies. Conclusion: A combination of
experimental and simulation methods usually makes the accuracy of the dose
estimates more reliable. The mean ESD estimated in this study is lower than
the DRL published by NRPB, CEC, and IAEA. Also the published ED is almost
more than other studies. The results of this study are used to optimize the dose level of patients.
Keywords :
Patient radiation dose , radiography , effective dose , entrance surface dose
Journal title :
International Journal of Radiation Research