Author/Authors :
Rezvani Kakhki, Behrang Department of Emergency Medicine - Faculty of Medicine - Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran , Ebrahimi, Mohsen Department of Emergency Medicine - Faculty of Medicine - Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran , Foroughian, Mahdi Department of Emergency Medicine - Faculty of Medicine - Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran , Khajeh Nasiri, Samaneh Department of Radiology - Faculty of Medicine - Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran , Eslami, Vahid University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Texas, USA , Anavri Ardakani, Saeideh Department of Neurology - Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran , Ahmadi, Reza Department of Emergency Medicine - Faculty of Medicine - Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
Abstract :
Objective: The purpose of the current study was to assess the success rate of posterior
tibial nerve block in the ankle with and without ultrasound guidance for pain management
in emergency departments.
Methods: This clinical trial was conducted on 80 individuals who needed posterior tibial
nerve block in the ankle at the emergency department of Hashemi Nejad hospital and
Edalatian emergency center in Mashhad, Iran. The eligible individuals were randomly
assigned to one of two groups, designated the control (landmark-based nerve block) and
the case group (ultrasound-guided nerve block). The two groups were compared in terms
of the main measurable outcomes. The data were analyzed using SPSS software (version
20) by nonparametric tests.
Results: According to the findings, the mean and median of nerve block success in the
landmark-based and ultrasound-guided methods were significantly different between
the two groups, both 15 (P = 0.02) and 30 (P = 0.001) min post-intervention. In this regard,
nerve block with ultrasound guidance had a higher success rate compared to the landmark
method. However, no significant difference between the two interventions was found in
terms of the mean and median of the procedure duration (P = 0.8) and injection frequency
(P = 0.4). On the other hand, the two groups were significantly different regarding the
median and mean of patient satisfaction (P = 0.00), duration of analgesia (P = 0.004), and
nerve block-related complications (P = 0.03).
Conclusion: The findings revealed that the relatively new technique of nerve block
by ultrasound-guide resulted in better outcomes than the landmark-based method.
Consequently, this method could be adopted to control acute pain in the emergency departments and improve patient care.
Keywords :
Nerve block , Tibial nerve , Ultrasound , Ankle