Title of article :
Comparison of CBCT and Digital Periapical Radiography in Detection of Pulpal Exposure in External Cervical Root Resorption: an in-vitro study
Author/Authors :
Ghaznavy, Amineh postgraduate student of periodontics in Esfahan university - dental branch , Talaeipour, Ahmad reza Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology of Islamic Azad University - Dental Branch of Tehran , Vatanpour, Mehdi Department of Endodontics of Islamic Azad University - Dental Branch of Tehran , Moshari, Amir abbas Department of Endodontics of Islamic Azad University - Dental Branch of Tehran
Abstract :
Introduction: pulpal exposures originated from the external cervical root resorptions have
major effects, on the treatment and prognosis, that could result in tooth loss. This study was performed
to compare two different imaging systems-digital radiography with PSP Sensor in three
horizontal different views and CBCT images- to assess pulpal exposure in simulated cavity of
external cervical root resorptions.
Materials and Methods: Eighty maxilla central incisor teeth with straight roots were included.
Teeth were randomly divided to two groups (40 teeth with and 40 without pulpal exposures).
Each sample was assessed digital radiography with PSP Sensor (in 3 horizontal angles) and
CBCT image system, to detect the presence of pulpal exposures. False Negative and False Positive
results in 2 imaging procedures were judged with ratio test.
Results: The results showed in CBCT (P.P.V = 85/7) and (N.P.V = 89/5) and in digital
intraoral radiography (P.P.V = 80) and (N.P.V = 80) in proximal defects and in CBCT
(P.P.V = 93 / 3) and (N.P.V = 100) and intraoral digital radiography (P.P.V = 77/8) and
(N.P.V = 75) in buccal defects. In buccal defects, ratio test showed that there is a significant
difference between CBCT and intraoral digital radiography technique (0/03>P)
but is not significant in proximal defects (0/4>P), (Significance level was 0/05).
Conclusion: The results showed that despite the higher resolution CBCT images than
digital intraoral radiography, there were no significant differences in detection of exposure
in proximal surfaces between two imaging systems. The differences in detection
of buccal defects was significant, the accuracy of CBCT images in detection of buccal
defects was significantly higher than PSP digital radiographies.
Keywords :
Radiographic Image Enhancement , Root Resorption , Tooth Resorption , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Journal title :
Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Pathology and Surgery