Author/Authors :
Hojjati, Fateme Laser Application in Medical Sciences Research Center - Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Afjei, Mohammad Hosein Department of Physiotherapy - School of Rehabilitation Sciences - Iran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services (IUMS), Tehran, Iran , Ebrahimi Takamjani, Ismail Department of Physiotherapy - School of Rehabilitation Sciences - Iran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services (IUMS), Tehran, Iran , Rayegani, Mansour Physical medicine & rehabilitation research center - Shahid Beheshti University Of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Sarrafzadeh, Javad Department of Physiotherapy - School of Rehabilitation Sciences - Iran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services (IUMS), Tehran, Iran , Raeissadat, Ahmad Physical medicine & rehabilitation research center - Shahid Beheshti University Of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Payami, Sara Department of Emergency Medicine - Amir al momenin Hospital - Tehran Azad University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract :
Introduction: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral nerve entrapment.
Various treatments have been suggested for CTS and there is no consensus on their superiority and
the order of their use. Laser therapy is a non-invasive treatment method for many musculoskeletal
diseases, including CTS. This study aimed to determine and compare the effect of high-power lasers
(HPLs) and low-power lasers (LPLs) on pain severity, function, pinch strength, and nerve conduction
study findings in patients aged 30-50 years with mild or moderate CTS.
Methods: This is a prospective, randomized, single-blind clinical trial. The study population
included 45 patients aged 30-50 years who came to the physical medicine and rehabilitation clinic
of Shohada-e-Tajrish hospital and mild or moderate CTS was confirmed for them. Patients were
randomly assigned to control, LPL therapy, and HPL therapy groups. Pain, function, pinch strength,
and nerve conduction study findings were recorded in all groups before, immediately and 12 weeks
after the treatment. All data were compared using SPSS version 21.
Results: All groups showed improvement regarding pain, function, and pinch strength. Laser therapy
showed significantly better results compared to a wrist splint, but no significant difference was seen
between high-power and LPL therapy groups. Nerve conduction evaluation findings did not reveal
any significant difference.
Conclusion: Both the wrist splint and laser therapy can improve the symptoms of carpal tunnel
syndrome. HPL therapy showed better results, although not significantly different from LPL therapy.
Keywords :
Carpal tunnel syndrome , High-intensity laser therapy , Low-intensity laser therapy , Electrodiagnostic evaluation