Author/Authors :
A. Gamal, Mohamed Ain Shams University Hospital, Cairo, Egypt , Higazy, Ahmed Ain Shams University Hospital, Cairo, Egypt , F. Ebskharoun, Samuel Maadi Military Hospital, Cairo, Egypt , Radwan, Ahmed Ain Shams University Hospital, Cairo, Egypt
Abstract :
Introduction: our study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of Holmium: YAG laser internal
urethrotomy compared to the cold knife internal urethrotomy.
Methods: Eighty adult male patients presented with a urethral stricture less than 1.5 cm were
included in our study; they were randomly allocated into 2 groups representing Holmium and cold
knife internal urethrotomy. A careful evaluation with ascending cystourethrogram and uroflowmetry
were done on all patients, and they were followed up for 1 year with uroflowmetry.
Results: Each group included 40 patients sharing the same demographic data. The most common
cause of a urethral stricture in both groups was iatrogenic injury. The mean operative time of the
cold knife urethrotomy procedure was 10.98 ± 2.40 minutes compared to 15.43 ± 2.48 minutes
in the holmium laser urethrotomy group with a highly significant difference. The results showed
success rates of 90% and 80% for the holmium laser and cold knife internal urethrotomy groups
respectively. The perioperative complication according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, showed
no statistically significant difference in grade 1 and 2 complications. A recurrence rate with the need
for redo surgery representing grade 3B complication was seen in 4 cases in the Holmium group
compared to 8 cases in the cold knife group with a statistically significant difference.
Conclusion: Both Holmium Laser and cold knife internal urethrotomy are an effective surgical
option for the treatment of a urethral stricture less than 1.5 cm with a promising outcome after 1-year
follow-up with a better success rate using the Holmium laser.
Keywords :
Holmium laser , Urethral stricture , Outflow obstruction , Internal urethrotomy , Uroflowmetry