Title of article :
Effect of Light-Emitting Diode Phototherapy on Allograft Bone After Open Sinus Lift Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial (Concurrent Parallel)
Author/Authors :
Arshad, Mahnaz Dental Research Center - Dentistry Research Institute - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran Iran , Ghanavati, Zahra School of Dentistry - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Aminishakib, Pouyan Oral and Maxillofacial Pathologist - Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology - Faculty of Dentistry - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Rasouli, Kamran School of Dentistry - International Campus - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Shirani, Gholamreza Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery - Craniomaxillofacial Research Center - School of Dentistry - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract :
Introduction: Phototherapy with a light-emitting diode (LED) is used in medicine due to its potential
bio-stimulatory effects on the human body. However, controversy still exists regarding the efficacy of
low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and phototherapy with LED. This in vivo study aimed to quantitatively
and qualitatively assess the newly formed bone following LED phototherapy of the human maxillary
sinuses.
Methods: This randomized clinical trial (concurrent parallel) was conducted on 44 patients in two
groups (n=22) at the Implant Department of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Randomization
was done by a random sequence generator program. The inclusion criteria were absence of chronic
sinusitis and chronic bone marrow conditions, no history of surgery at the site, absence of diabetes
mellitus, no history of chemotherapy or radiotherapy, maxillary premolar edentulism, and signing
informed consent forms. Group A underwent LED phototherapy with 620 ± 2 nm wavelength for
20 minutes daily for a total of 21 days after sinus lift surgery. Group B served as the control group
and did not receive phototherapy. After 6 months, the grafted sites were re-opened for implant
placement, and bone biopsy samples were obtained using a trephine bur. The samples were stained
with hematoxylin and eosin and inspected under a light microscope. The results were statistically
analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Both the surgeon and pathologist were blinded to the
group allocation of patients.
Results: Forty tissue specimens were analyzed. Insignificant differences existed between the two
groups in terms of the degree of inflammation, bone quality, and maturity of collagen. Histological
analyses revealed no significant difference in the mineralized areas of bone between the two groups
(P>0.05).
Conclusion: The results indicated that LED phototherapy cannot significantly enhance osteogenesis
after sinus lift surgery. No side effects were observed in the experimental group.
Keywords :
Laser phototherapy , Low-level light therapy , Phototherapy , Biostimulation , Laser
Journal title :
Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences