Author/Authors :
Hajian, Sepideh Department of Nephrology - Velayat Hospital - Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran , Rastgoo, Nafiseh Metabolic Diseases Research Center - Research Institute for Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases - Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran , Jamshidi, Sanaz Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
Abstract :
Introduction: According to available guidelines, home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM)
can be used to diagnose hypertension and monitor its treatment; however, its effectiveness has
rarely been studied in developing countries, including Iran.
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of HBPM, as compared with
that of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and office blood pressure
measurement (OBPM).
Patients and Methods: This study was conducted on 28 patients suspected of having primary
hypertension. The blood pressure of the patients was measured by four methods. Initially,
blood pressure was measured by a non-physician using a digital sphygmomanometer in a
clinic (OBPM-Digital). After about 1 hour, blood pressure was measured by a physician at the
clinic using a mercury sphygmomanometer (OBPM-Mercury). In the third stage, the patient’s
blood pressure was monitored for 24 hours by the ABPM method. In the fourth stage, each
subject used a digital sphygmomanometer to measure HBPM for seven consecutive days.
Results: The blood pressure values measured through the ABPM method were significantly
lower than those measured by other methods (P<0.05). The prevalence of hypertension
diagnosed by OBPM-Mercury, OBPM-Digital, HBPM, and ABPM method was 82%, 54%,
50%, and 21%, respectively. As compared with ABPM as the gold standard, the diagnostic
accuracy of HBPM, OBPM-Digital, and OBPM-Mercury was 64%, 61%, and 32%, respectively.
The frequency of white coat hypertension (WCH) diagnosed by HBPM and ABPM methods
was 39% and 64%, respectively, and the frequency of masked hypertension (MH) diagnosed
was 7% and 4%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of HBPM, as
compared with ABPM, in detecting MH were 100%, 96%, and 97%, respectively; in addition,
as compared with WCH, they were 56%, 90%, and 68%, respectively.
Conclusion: The findings of the present study showed that HBPM had higher diagnostic
accuracy than OBPM in diagnosing hypertension. Also, HBPM was able to detect MH with
a high level of diagnostic accuracy, and in more than two-thirds of cases, it was also able to
detect WCH and diagnose patients with sustained hypertension.
Keywords :
Hypertension , Out-of-clinic blood pressure measurement , Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) , 24- Hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) , Diagnostic accuracy