Title of article :
Clindamycin Stewardship: An Opportunity for Hospitalized Patients in Razi Hospital, Rasht, Iran
Author/Authors :
Ala, Shahram Department of Clinical Pharmacy - Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Mazandaran , Kamali, Afsoun Faculty of Pharmacy - Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Ramsar, Mazandaran , Avan, Razieh Department of Pharmacology - Infectious Diseases Research Center - Faculty of Medicine - Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
Abstract :
Background: In hospitalized patients, the most common used drugs are antibiotics. Programs designed
to rational use of antibiotics improve the quality of care and infection management, and reduce costs.
Aims and Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the rational use of clindamycin in Razi
Hospital, Rasht, Iran. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study was performed
in Razi Hospital, Rasht, Iran. All hospitalized patients who received clindamycin were included. Patient’s
demographic, duration of use and dose of clindamycin therapy, and other concomitant antibiotics were
collected from patients’ medical records. Rational clindamycin prescribing was evaluated based on
recommendations of UpToDate software, version 21.6, Waltham, MA, United States. Analysis of data
was performed by the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software, version 16.0. Results: A total
of 607 patients receiving clindamycin during 15 months of study were evaluated. The mean age of the
patients was 51.51 ± 15.92 years (range: 16–87 years). The most hospitalized patients receiving clindamycin
were in internal ward (86%). The most frequently coadministered antibiotics with clindamycin were
third-generation cephalosporins (47.9%). The majority of patients admitted in the winter (40.4%). The
most frequently primary and final diagnosis in patients receiving clindamycin was reported pneumonia,
respectively, 33.1% and 32.1%. Indication, dose, and duration of clindamycin were appropriate in 583
(96%), 277(47.5%), and 208 (35.7%) patients, respectively. Conclusion: The rate of incorrect dose and
duration of clindamycin in our hospital were significantly high. Also, the majority of its prescription were
as off-label indications. Programs for more justified administration of clindamycin to improve quality of
care and decrease antibacterial resistance and cost are necessary.
Keywords :
Antibiotic , clindamycin , drug utilization evaluation
Journal title :
Journal of Reports in Pharmaceutical Sciences