Author/Authors :
Jamil, Leili Department of Clinical Psychology - AJA University of Medical Sciences - Tehran, Iran , Ashouri, Ahmad Department of Clinical Psychology - AJA University of Medical Sciences - Tehran, Iran , Zamirinejad, Somayeh Department of Clinical Psychology - AJA University of Medical Sciences - Tehran, Iran , Mahaki, Behzad Department of Biostatistics - Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences - Kermanshah, Iran
Abstract :
Background: Procrastination is a common and widespread phenomenon that affects 15-20% of the general popula ion and 50% of
students. Since developing and providing beneficial and effective interventions for procrastination needs a strong, comprehensive
theoretical background explanation, the aim of the study was to assess the underlying presenting a causal model.
ransdiagnostic factors of procrastination and
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 390 college students were asked to fill out a packet of self-report measures, which included the Pure procrastination scale, Difficulties in emotion regulation scale, Depression-anxiety-stress scales, Frost multidimensional
perfectionism scale, Rumination response scale, Penn state worry questionnaire, Acceptance and action questionn ire. The causal model was tested using structural equation modeling (SEM).
Results: Results of the SEM indicate that perfectionism was significantly associated with increasing emotion dysregulation (β=0.446, P<0.001) and emotion dysregulation was significantly associated with increasi g anxiety (β=0.499, P<0.001) and depression
(β=0.478, P<0.001), and then anxiety and depression with other variables, such as worry (β=0.245, P<0.001; β=0.004, P=0.935),
rumination (β=0.046, P=0.424; β=0.418, P<0.001) and experiential avoidance (β=0.277, P<0.001;
β=0.319, P<0.001) related to
procrastination. Finally, worry has the most significant increasing effect on procrastination. The very small root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA=0.038), together with large values of comparative fit index (CFI=0.985), relative fit index (RFI=0.917), and normed fit index (NFI=0.979) indicated that the model was well fit.
Conclusion: Perfectionism, emotion dysregulation, negative affects, worry, rumination, and experiential avoidance, known as
transdiagnostic
factors, had
a causal relationship with
procrastination, and reducing each transdiagnostic factor will improve
procrastination. This study could be considered as a cornerstone for further studies on procrastination from a transdiag ostic approach.
Keywords :
Procrastination , Emotion Dysregulation , Transdiagnostic Factors , Structural Equation Modeling