Title of article
Comparing the Effect of Immediate versus Delayed Initiation of Tacrolimus on Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Randomized Open-label Clinical Trial
Author/Authors
Ghadimi, Maryam Department of Clinical Pharmacy - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Dashti-Khavidaki, Simin Nephrology Research Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Khatami, Mohammad-Reza Nephrology Research Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Mahdavi-Mazdeh,Mitra Nephrology Research Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Gatmiri, Mansoor Nephrology Research Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Minoo, Farzaneh Sadat Nephrology Research Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Naderi, Neda Nephrology Research Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Jafari, Atefeh Department of Clinical Pharmacy - Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran , Abbasi, Mohammad-Reza Nephrology Research Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Ghafari, Ali Nephrology Research Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Pages
8
From page
69
To page
76
Abstract
Objective: Delayed graft function (DGF) is an early complication after kidney
transplantation with negative impact on allograft outcomes. This study assessed the
effect of delayed initiation of tacrolimus as a nephrotoxic drug, on DGF occurrence
and allograft function. Methods: This randomized, open‐label clinical trial was
conducted on kidney transplant recipients with the age of at least 14 years who
underwent the first kidney transplantation from deceased or living donor. Patients
were randomly allocated to immediate (n = 26) or delayed tacrolimus (n = 27)
groups. All patients received thymoglobulin as induction therapy and similar
maintenance immunosuppression including tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and
prednisolone with the difference in the time of initiation of tacrolimus either on
the day of transplantation (immediate tacrolimus group) or day 3 after transplant
(delayed tacrolimus group). Findings: DGF incidence (46.15% vs. 37.04%;
P = 0.501) and duration (9.75 ± 6.41 vs. 8.6 ± 6.16 days; P = 0.675) were not
different between the immediate and delayed tacrolimus groups. Estimated
creatinine clearance using Cockcroft–Gault equation (63.14 ± 18.81 vs.
58.19 ± 19.42 mL/min in immediate and delayed tacrolimus groups respectively;
P = 0.373) and estimated acute rejection‐free survival were also comparable
between the groups over the 3 months of follow‐up. Compared with the immediate
group, the delayed tacrolimus group showed higher estimated 3‐month grafts’
survival (100% vs. 84.27%; P = 0.072). Conclusion: Delayed initiation of
tacrolimus after kidney transplantation under the umbrella of thymoglobulin
induction did not result in either lower incidence or duration of DGF or improved
the level of graft function in kidney transplant recipients but non-statistically
significant increased 3‐month grafts' survival.
Keywords
Delayed graft function , delayed Tacrolimus , immediate Tacrolimus , kidney transplantation
Journal title
Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice
Serial Year
2018
Record number
2728366
Link To Document