Title of article :
Statin Type and Cancer Outcomes in Patients with Diabetes Type 2 and Solid Tumors
Author/Authors :
Ceacareanu, Alice C. Translational Biomedical Research Management Graduate Program - Hartwick College, Oneonta, New York, USA , Jolly, Shanria D. Translational Biomedical Research Management Graduate Program - Hartwick College, Oneonta, New York, USA , Nimako, George K. Department of Pharmacy Practice - School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences - State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA , Wintrob, Zachary A. P. Translational Biomedical Research Management Graduate Program - Hartwick College, Oneonta, New York, USA
Abstract :
Objective: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) affects 10% of Americans
and is associated with an increased incidence of cancer. Statins are first‑line
cholesterol-lowering medications in the treatment of hyperlipidemia. Several
studies have demonstrated a relationship between statin use and reduced
cancer incidence. We examined the cancer benefits of statin subtypes, with
specific attention to disease‑free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).
Methods: This retrospective review included adults with T2DM diagnosed with
solid tumors at Roswell Park Cancer Institute in Buffalo, NY, USA (2003–2010).
Individuals with gestational diabetes, incomplete records, or diagnosed with rare
solid tumors were excluded. Follow-up began at the date of diagnosis and ended
with the first confirmed recurrence, death, or loss of contact. Demographics were
assessed by Chi-square, Kaplan–Meier survival analyses, and Cox proportional
hazards regression. Findings: Overall, 1102 patients met inclusion criteria, 52.1%
of the study participants were female, and 578 participants (52.5%) died during the
follow-up period which ranged from 0 to 156 months. Hydrophilic statin use was
associated with improved DFS at 5-year follow-up (41.0% vs. 36.9%, P = 0.0077)
compared to lipophilic statin use. Multivariate regression revealed that hydrophilic
statins were associated with improved DFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.706, 95%
confidence interval [CI]: 0.526–0.947) and OS (HR: 0.685, 95% CI: 0.503–0.934).
Pravastatin was associated with improved OS (HR: 0.674, 95% CI: 0.471–0.964).
Conclusion: In patients with T2DM and cancer, hydrophilic statins, and
pravastatin in particular, are associated with improved DFS as well as OS. Further
research examining the cancer‑specific effects of hydrophilic and lipophilic statins
is needed to better understand their beneficial effects
Keywords :
pravastatin , lipophilic statins , hydrophilic statins , Cancer mortality , cancer recurrence , diabetes mellitus
Journal title :
Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice