Title of article :
Comparison of Two Different Traditional Methods of Rose Oil Preparation in Terms of Physicochemical Factors
Author/Authors :
Mohammad-Taghizadeh Kashani, Leila Department of Traditional Medicine - Medicinal Plants Research Center of Barij, Kashan, Iran , Memarzadeh, Mohammad Reza Department of FormulationMedicinal Plants Research Center of Barij, Kashan, Iran , Hatami, Alireza Department of Phytochemistry, - Medicinal Plants Research Center of Barij, Kashan, Iran , Shirzad , Meysam Department of Traditional Medicine - School of Traditional Medicine - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Ahmadian-Attari, Mohammad Mahdi Department of Traditional Medicine - Medicinal Plants Research Center of Barij, Kashan, Iran
Abstract :
Rose oil (Rowghan-e Gol) is an Iranian traditional medicine used both topical and systemic in
gastritis, inflammatory bowel disease, headache, and hemorrhoids. Traditional manuscripts have
reported two different methods of preparation for this medicine; the first is macerating rose petals
in sesame oil for 25 days under sunlight (R1), and the second is extracting rose petals by
squeezing and then boiling the mixture of the extract with sesame oil to evaporate aqueous part
(R2). The aim of this article was to study both traditional methods of rose oil preparation in terms
of physicochemical factors to evaluate which method is best for industrializing. For this purpose,
total phenolics (based on gallic acid), total essential oils (based on citronellol), thin layer
chromatography (TLC) profile of the constituents, and oil rancidity indices, i.e., acid and peroxide
values were determined through spectrophotometer, gas chromatograph, TLC, and titration,
respectively. R1 had greater amounts of total phenolics (0.05% vs. 0.01%). The amount of its
essential oil was 15.5 times higher than R2. TLC profiles showed that R1 had one more spots
(Rr = 0.04) representing flavonoids (according to natural product indicator). About oil rancidity
indices, both samples were in standard ranges but all indices of R1 were greater than R2. It could
be due to long exposure of R1 to sunlight. According to the results, R1 had more amounts of
flavonoids and essential oils. These compounds are considered as therapeutic agents of rose oil.
Therefore, R1 is a more preferable than R2. Appropriate antioxidants should be utilized to protect
R1 against sunlight oxidation.
Keywords :
Citronellol , Total Flavonoids , Peroxide Value , Rose Oil , Iranian Traditional Medicine , Essential Oil , Acid Value
Journal title :
Traditional and Integrative Medicine