Title of article :
Teaching Writing Assessment: Does Metacognitive Awareness-Raising Work?
Author/Authors :
Kouhpayehzadeh Esfahani, Mojgan English Department - Islamic Azad University South Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran , Rashtchi, Mojgan English Department - Islamic Azad University North Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran , Rostami Abousaidi, Ali Asghar English Department - Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran , Mowlaie, Bahram English Department - Islamic Azad University South Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
Abstract :
The present quasi-experimental study with a non-equivalent control group pretest-posttest design
investigated the effects of metacognitive awareness on developing Iranian EFL learners’ assessment
ability. Forty-one male and female upper-intermediate level learners in two intact classes from an
English language school in the Tehran province were selected based on convenience sampling. The
classes were randomly assigned to the Cognitive-Based Assessment Instruction Group (CAIG) the and
Metacognitive-Based Assessment Instruction Group (MAIG). A general proficiency test administered
before the treatment verified the participants’ homogeneity. The Metacognitive Awareness Writing
Questionnaire and Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire were also administered before and
after the study to measure participants’ metacognitive awareness level and self-regulation. The MAIG
used metacognitive strategies such as planning, monitoring, and revising to assess English essays. The
CAIG performed assessments based on cognitive strategies and a Writing Rubric. The participants’
improvement in assessment was measured every other session during the treatment. After the treatment,
the participants took two writing posttests (rehearsed and unrehearsed writing topics). Multivariate
Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) results showed that the MAIG outperformed the CAIG in both
posttests, and raising metacognitive awareness could significantly enhance the participants’ assessment
ability. The Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (RM-ANOVA) and Analysis of Covariance
(ANCOVA) revealed that the MAIG participants’ performances were significantly better than the CAIG
on seven writing assessments. The MAIG’s self-regulation was also significantly higher. This study has
implications for materials developers, EFL teachers, and syllabus designers to focus on raising
metacognitive awareness in writing assessment.
Keywords :
Cognitive-Based Assessment Instruction , Metacognitive-Based Assessment Instruction , Self-Regulation , Writing Assessment
Journal title :
Journal of Language and Translation